Why Has the US Apparently Not Tested for the COVID-19 Coronavirus?

Pam Barker | Director of TLB Europe Reloaded Project

At ER, we are mightily suspicious of the immense MSM and government panic regarding the ‘coronavirus’ here in France and in other Western countries. There are many coronaviruses among humans as well as animals: COVID-19, a new virus we are told, is just one of them, causing, to date, mostly Chinese people to die from severe lung inflammation and organ shutdown (see chart below). When these supposed cases pop up, outside of China, are they actually the deadly COVID-19 or just another case of a nasty flu or something similar? This question goes for all our countries, although it is the US that is addressed in the article below. Note we are not questioning if there really is a COVID-19 virus, or the ability to identify it by scientists. We are simply sceptical of what is being reported on as real COVID-19 cases in many western countries, and what policies our governments may justify for us on that basis.

The article below by Larry Romanoff addresses both the quantity and quality of testing for COVID-19 in the US by the CDC, i.e. not much testing is being done at all, and what there has been has generated entirely unreliable results. An accurate test from China that works in just 29 minutes, approved for use by the EU, is now being shipped around the world for this purpose. To the US? There is no indication of this.

As Romanoff wonders below, are actual COVID-19 cases / deaths just being passed off as the ‘flu and buried in those statistics? Or, we wonder, is the lack of accurate testing, a strange phenomenon for sure, indicative of something else – a cover for declaring an emergency over the ‘coronavirus’ when there isn’t one? A ‘reason’ to roll out a profitable vaccine on the basis of almost nothing? Or are the claimed cases real (still to be determined by accurate testing), but that the number of deaths is much lower because of genetic, racial differences in the uptake of the disease (as we’ve reported on here and here)?

We’re simply raising questions and open to having our minds changed.

Dr. Paul Cottrell, contacted by a CDC employee according to Romanoff, claims that the CDC suspects many more US cases of COVID-19 than they’re willing to admit although this has yet to be authenticated. However, how is this known when almost no reliable testing has been done thus far? Another interesting fact Romanoff throws in is the number of leaks of deadly pathogens the US experienced between 2005 and 2012 – over 1,000, higher than labs in countries such as China. Clearly there is much more going on than we’re being told.

Corroborating Romanoff’s testing claims, a facility for the elderly in Kirkland WA is currently in the news as being the epicenter of the ‘coronavirus’ outbreak in the States. See this CNN report from just 3 days ago (Thursday), titled This nursing home has become the US epicenter of the coronavirus outbreak, but patients’ family members say they’re left in the dark.

Five or six deaths have been connected to the facility (from what precisely?), yet it is suffering from a disturbing lack of testing:

More than 50 residents and staff will be tested (ER: it hasn’t happened yet) after experiencing symptoms, Dr. Jeffrey Duchin, health officer for Seattle and King County, has said. Wednesday, he told reporters that at some point all residents will be tested.

***

Some family members of patients are on a private email chain to share their concerns, Herrick said. The facility also sends daily emails to the families, but the discussion among some families is why isn’t the facility testing all patients.
“Why aren’t they testing our families? That’s the big one,” she said. “And also, having been there with our families, are we at risk?”
Let’s remind ourselves that most people do not live to be, say, 85 or 89 (the ages of some of those reported deceased here in France of the ‘coronavirus’); and those that do, often immobile, are highly susceptible to seasonal diseases like flu, and the disease of immobility – pneumonia. Some of them will die during each and every ‘flu season anyway.
.
In the United States, the US Centers for Disease Control is distributing the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel to public health labs through its International Reagent Resource.[11] One of three genetic tests in older versions of the test kits caused inconclusive results, and a bottleneck of testing at the CDC in Atlanta; tests using two components were determined to be reliable on February 28, 2020, allowing state and local laboratories to complete testing quickly.[12] The test was approved by the Food and Drug Administration under an Emergency Use Authorization.
.
For relative scale, this Statista set of data for deaths worldwide from COVID-19 as of March 4, 2020 (see below) is remarkable for the way it is skewed toward China, and how few countries are represented on the chart. Africa, apparently, is virtually untouched as of this past week.

What is meant by ‘coronavirus’ when alleged cases of the disease and resulting deaths are being reported in our media? That’s the question we’re staying attuned to, as well as radically differing national statistics.

********

Why Is the US Apparently Not Testing for the COVID-19 Coronavirus?

“Testing for coronavirus is not available yet in New York City.”

All reports are that the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is not testing for the new coronavirus COVID-19, and that reliable tests in any case do not exist in the US. This is an area bereft of rational explanation.

The US may have many thousands of coronavirus infections, but no one knows because the CDC are not testing for them.

The CDC produced a series of test kits that produced wildly random results, positive or negative, followed by instructions to discard the test kits as unreliable. (1) Several U.S. states said the new coronavirus test kits did not work, while others said they were totally unreliable. (2) New York City reported the government-issued tests are faulty and “cannot be relied upon to provide an accurate result”. Those faulty kits were also shipped all over the world, but to my knowledge the CDC have relayed that information to no one outside the US.

Further, American hospitals have been discharging infected patients on the basis of these faulty tests, the CDC explaining that there have been many situations where test results alternate between negative and positive on the same patients. (3)

One US media source said California had only 200 proper testing kits in the entire state, and very few anywhere in the country, but I could find no evidence the CDC is preparing new test kits, apparently doing nothing. It seems the reason the CDC can claim no COVID-19 infections is because they are not testing, and are unable in any case to perform reliable tests. It might be amusing to mock the US for being unable to produce a reliable test, but the Americans are not incompetent, which unfortunately raises many questions.

It seems bizarre that, while the CDC could quickly develop and apply reliable tests nationwide, they apparently prefer to not do that, at a time when California and other states have already declared an emergency, and the White House canceled flights to China and requested $2 billion in virus funding.

According to media reports, the US has done only around 450 tests while even much smaller nations have tested many tens of thousands. (4) Even more surprising is that the CDC is apparently refusing to test for COVID-19 infections. The first such US infection from unknown sources wasn’t tested until after the patient had been on a ventilator in the ICU for nearly one week. The hospital claimed they “were unable to get her tested for five days, claiming the CDC refused to test victims who had not traveled to outbreak-hit regions”. It appears The CDC simply refused to administer a test even though the patient was in critical condition. (5)

In the meantime, a Chinese firm has put into mass production a highly-accurate test for COVID-19 that has received the highest level of European certification and that is now being marketed worldwide. China’s genomics sequencing company BGI has received international recognition and vast orders for its detection kits for the novel coronavirus. It has already shipped many hundreds of thousands to more than 25 countries and is in the order process with another 25 nations. For one, if the CDC wanted reliable tests, they could simply order from China. (6)

The CDC estimates that this flu season has seen at least 29 million illnesses, 280,000 hospitalisations and 16,000 deaths (16), but Japan and Taiwan both stated that American coronavirus deaths (potentially in the thousands) are being buried in untested infections, and in fatalities blamed on the seasonal flu. If those deaths were tested, the results are not being made public. (7) (8)

Chinese news website Huanqiu (9) related one case in the US where a woman’s relative was told by physicians he died of the flu, but where the death certificate listed the coronavirus as the cause of death. On February 26, ABC News affiliate KJCT8 News Network reported that a woman recently told the media that her sister died on from coronavirus infection. Montrose, Colorado resident Almeta Stone said,

“They (the medical staff) kept us informed that it was the flu, and when I got the death certificate, there was a coronavirus in the cause of death.” (10)

We cannot ascertain the number of such cases in the US but since the CDC apparently has no reliable test kits and is conducting little or no testing for the virus, there may be others. As I stated in an earlier article (11), virologists from Japan and Taiwan both came to the conclusion that this might indicate the coronavirus had already spread in the US but where the symptoms were being officially attributed to other diseases, and thus possibly masked.

The following was reported in detail in prominent Chinese media, who don’t normally publish anything speculative. An American, Dr. Paul Cottrell says he was sent a copy of a message between an employee of the US CDC and a listener to his channel.

According to the CDC official webpage, the number of total confirmed coronavirus cases in the US was 35 at the time (February 21, 2020), but the message copied to Cottrell read:

“There have already been over 1,000 cases in the US, although on the news, they are just keeping things quiet for now and reporting far less to the public.”

In the message, the alleged CDC source stated the “CDC suspects cases in over 32 states at this point”. Cottrell says he has been unable so far to obtain confirmation from the CDC of the message or its contents, but no denials either. Cottrell is a Ph.D, has completed pre-med studies and is currently enrolled in a Biology Master’s program at Harvard. (12)

Further, a senior official at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is now seeking federal protection from attempts to silence him after alleging that the US government was not taking adequate precautions against the COVID-19 outbreak. The complaint alleged that federal health employees were “improperly deployed” to assist the quarantined Americans evacuated from Wuhan, China, and were “not properly trained or equipped to operate in a public health emergency situation”, according to a Washington Post report and portions of the complaint filing obtained by other media. (13)

There is another very curious part of this apparent puzzle. In August of 2019, the CDC completely shut down the US Military bio-weapons lab at Fort Detrick (USAMRIID) for “bio-safety hazards”. They issued a cease-and-desist order and all research was ordered to be immediately suspended until further notice but, interestingly, the US media took almost no note of this event. One would imagine that in light of such a drastic measure, rampant testing would be obligatory, but in this case apparently not. Yet Taiwan media reported COVID-19 infections of Taiwanese residents originating from the US (Hawaii) in September of 2019. The World Military Games were held in Wuhan during the last two weeks of October. (14) (15) (16)

It may be worth mentioning that this wasn’t the first time such concerns have arisen. Between 2005 and 2012, the latest date for which I have accurate figures, the US CDC received 1,059 “release reports” – an average of an incident every few days involving “theft, loss, release causing an occupational exposure, or release outside of primary biocontainment barriers” of dangerous pathogens. The NYT and Western media pilloried China for several small leaks of a virus ten years ago, but the Americans have had 1,057 more serious releases than did China during the same period, many of these involving deadly pathogens. (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22)

************

Original article

Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.

Notes

(1) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-tests-new-york-us-cases-kits-trump-cdc-results-a9365921.html

(2) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-health-usa-idUSKBN2062HT

(3) https://www.shine.cn/news/world/2003023225/

(4) https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/02/25/cdc-coronavirus-test/

(5) https://www.shine.cn/news/world/2002283012/

(6) https://www.chinadailyhk.com/article/123275

(7) https://www.thedailybeast.com/coronavirus-testing-in-the-us-is-somehow-looking-worse-by-the-day

(8) https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm

(9) https://www.huanqiu.com/

(10) https://www.shine.cn/news/world/2003023225/

(11) https://www.globalresearch.ca/china-coronavirus-shocking-update/5705196

(12) http://en.people.cn/n3/2020/0224/c90000-9661463.html

(13) http://en.people.cn/n3/2020/0228/c90000-9663208.html

(14) https://www.medicaldaily.com/cdc-shuts-down-militarys-deadly-diseases-lab-over-safety-concerns-440475

(15) https://cbrn.dfns.net/2019/08/07/cdc-shuts-down-usamriid-lab/

(16) https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/health/germs-fort-detrick-biohazard.html

(17) https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cdc-botched-handling-of-deadly-flu-virus/

(18) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK285575/

(19) http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2842494-CDC-2008-Autoclave-Potential-Exposure-Incident.html

(20) https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/p0711-lab-safety.html

(21) https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/06/02/newly-disclosed-cdc-lab-incidents-fuel-concerns-safety-transparency/84978860/

(22) http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2842405-CDC-Email-13May2011-Re-Tech-Leaving-Lab-Without.html

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*