ER Editor: Well well, election fraud is now becoming an issue for Germans, as well as French. Last September, Germans went to the polls to elect a new federal government – claims of fraud among voting districts in Berlin date from this time.
The reporting below can be found at Wochenblick.at. See Large-scale election fraud in Berlin: Red-Green benefited massively from “disagreements”.
The original report upon which both reports are based can be found here (browsers should translate): Exclusive: Election in Berlin must be repeated in at least one constituency. The report makes it clear that some candidates won by the slimmest of margins, such as 19 votes. And with some polling stations oddly closed during the middle of the afternoon, a key number of votes could have been lost.
To invoke a cultural generalization here, you wouldn’t expect this sort of organizational cock-up from the Germans.
Widespread election fraud uncovered in Berlin
The chaotic elections in Berlin and the simultaneous elections to the House of Representatives last September are making bigger and bigger waves. In the meantime, the Federal Election Commissioner has requested that the federal election be repeated in half of Berlin’s constituencies. At the regional state level, irregularities were deliberately waved through by the left-Green senate.
From the beginning, the election in the German capital had been accompanied by allegations of manipulation and fraud. While at first it looked as if the proceedings would remain entirely without consequences, research by the magazine Tichys Einblick this week has now revealed the alarming extent of discrepancies, including obvious electoral fraud. In the meantime, Federal Election Commissioner Georg Thiel even announced that in six of the twelve Berlin constituencies, the ballot would have to be repeated and filed an application to this effect.
Grotesque number of ‘electoral mishaps’
Thiel explained that the incidents were “mandate-relevant” (ER: In other words, the numbers of votes affected by these anomalies were enough to change the outcome of the vote.) In addition, minors and EU foreigners apparently took part in the election in violation of the law. The former Berlin MP and top candidate of the Free Voters, Marcel Luthe, had already announced last weekend that he would file criminal charges for voter fraud. He had already filed a complaint with the Berlin Constitutional Court after he was denied access to the minutes of the polling stations, which were actually open to the public.
The evaluation of the election documents showed that in some districts ballot papers from other districts were deliberately used, which thus became invalid. Often there were basically too few ballot papers. Too few voting booths were set up, which led to long queues with many voters being turned away. According to the state election administration, in many places the respective election officials decided at their own discretion who was allowed to vote.
Ballot resembled a banana republic
Nineteen percent of the polling stations were still open after 6.15 pm when the first forecasts were already being published in the media, which can influence the decision to vote, for example because parties are determined as winners or losers. Four polling stations even closed after 8 pm – according to the state election administration allegedly “because of the large crowd”. Luthe pointed out that this was not very credible, as almost 225 000 fewer voters had cast their ballots than in the 2017 federal election.
The delivery of ballot papers had also not worked as it should because of the Berlin Marathon taking place on the same Sunday. Due to the Corona pandemic, there had been a call in advance for increased use of the postal voting option. Here too, however, the delivery of the corresponding documents failed, so that it is completely unclear how many voters in the end did not make use of their right to vote or could not exercise it at all because the requested documents never reached them.
The Left Party MP Gesine Lötsch, one of three direct candidates of the party, recorded a lead of 8,773 votes in the district of Lichtenberg. However, since it is unknown how high the proportion of “lost votes” is, nobody knows whether Lötsch was actually elected. The possible consequences are far from insignificant: If Lötsch had not made it into the Bundestag, the Left Party would instantly lose its parliamentary group status there – because it would only have two seats.
Ex-Senator of the Interior makes scandalous statements
In any case, there are growing indications that the mishaps for which the incompetent Berlin city government is responsible were exploited by the very city government responsible to secure its election victory. After the scandalous circumstances surrounding the election became known, the then interior senator Andreas Geisel (SPD) nevertheless stated: “As things stand, I do not assume that the election in Berlin would have to be repeated on a large scale.”
It has now become known that the Senate Department of the Interior, led by Geisel, with reference to a court ruling from 2010, had instructed the election officer of the district of Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg, where masses of false and thus clearly invalid ballot papers had been issued according to the Berlin election law, to count 1,900 invalid votes as valid, 75 percent of which were for the Red-Red-Green Party.
However, the judgement used to justify this outrageous act was actually about a few votes in a staff council election. It is suspected that similar events may have taken place in other districts with false ballots.
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.