Upholding the Religious & Conscience-Based Vaccine Exemptions

Upholding Religious and Conscience-Based Vaccine Exemptions

By TLB Project Contributor: World Mercury Project Team

For many individuals and families, deeply held conscientious and religious beliefs play a guiding role in decisions about vaccination. Recognizing the primacy and legitimacy of these beliefs, 47 out of 50 states permit religious and/or conscience-based vaccine exemptions, and about 1% to 6% of kindergartners claim such exemptions.

A religious exemption generally asserts that “the administration of immunizing agents conflicts with the person’s religious tenets or practices.” Individuals who claim religious exemptions do not need to belong to a particular church or organized religion, but authorities may ask them to describe the religious or spiritual basis for their beliefs about vaccination. Philosophical or conscientious exemptions, available in 18 of the 47 states, generally state something to the effect that “no student is required to have an immunization that is contrary to the conscientiously held beliefs of his/her parent or guardian.”

The specific exemption legislation varies considerably from state to state. In some states, individuals requesting vaccine exemptions must complete additional requirements, such as obtaining affidavits or notarization or receiving “vaccine education” from health care providers. In the event of an illness outbreak, a number of states require that exempted students be excluded from school.

Conscience and Religious Freedom Division

Institutions such as the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and vaccine cheerleaders such as Richard Pan—both beholden to pharmaceutical industry donors—make little secret of their desire to override parents’ sincerely held conscientious and religious beliefs with regard to vaccination. In line with his goal of moving toward “stricter vaccination policies and enforcement,” Pan spearheaded passage of the 2015 bill (SB-277) that revoked all nonmedical vaccine exemptions in California. With the bill’s passage, California joined the only two other states (Mississippi and West Virginia) to have eliminated such exemptions.

…browbeaters should not be allowed to ride roughshod over citizens’ sincerely held religious or conscientious beliefs, …

Recognizing that browbeaters should not be allowed to ride roughshod over citizens’ sincerely held religious or conscientious beliefs, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), on January 18, announced that it was forming a Conscience and Religious Freedom Division within the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR). The new Division’s mandate will be to enforce “federal laws that protect conscience and the free exercise of religion and prohibit coercion and discrimination in health and human services.”

To date, most news stories about the new OCR Division have focused on the Division’s role in standing up for the moral or religious beliefs of health care providers. However, the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division has indicated that it may also be willing to receive and respond to complaints from citizens who have been prevented from freely exercising their conscientious and religious beliefs related to vaccination.

This is a big opportunity to not only retain the right to refuse vaccines on religious and conscientious grounds but also perhaps to reinstate religious and/or philosophical exemptions in California, West Virginia and Mississippi.

Act Now to Educate HHS on What You Want

From now until March 27, 2018, citizens have an opportunity to tell the OCR that they want the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division to explicitly include vaccine-related situations in the categories of complaints that the Division will consider. This is a big opportunity to not only retain the right to refuse vaccines on religious and conscientious grounds but also perhaps to reinstate religious and/or philosophical exemptions in California, West Virginia and Mississippi.

The OCR needs to hear from as many citizens as possible during the public comment period.

  1. It only takes a few minutes to submit a comment.
  2. In your comment, be sure to include the following: “Expand the categories for parents, students and children to file vaccine situation complaints.”
  3. Add the requested personal information (name, zip code, email address). There’s no need to include an organization name.
  4. Click the SUBMIT button.
  5. Below the comments area, you can read more information about the proposed rule.

Taking the step of commenting on the Federal register is paramount to ensuring that HHS and OCR hear the vaccine safety community.

••••

TLB Note: Please Take the time to Sign up for breaking news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the ‘Outstanding’ World Mercury Project. Your donation will help to support them in their phenomenal efforts.

••••

Read more great articles by World Mercury Project

••••

The above article (Upholding Religious and Conscience-Based Vaccine Exemptions) originated on worldmercuryproject.org and is republished here by contribution with attribution to author World Mercury Project Team and worldmercuryproject.org

••••

Click on the image below to visit TLB Project on twitter …

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

TLB has other above the fold articles, videos and stories available by clicking on “HOME” at the top of this post. Never miss a new post, sign up for E-Mail alerts at the bottom of the Home page and get a link dropped right to your in-box.

TheLibertyBeacon.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*