TLB Discovers a Shining Example of Activism: Right to Know & Right to Choose … Vaccination Rights

Baby-and-Vaccine 1

Preface by: TLB

Do you believe the Government has the right to force vaccinate you or your children?

Do you believe Big Pharmaceutical companies should have any say in your right to refuse drugs or vaccinations?

Do you believe these same companies should have influence in the writing of laws concerning the above?

Do you believe you should be made aware of (through government process) any laws that may compromise the above, and be given sufficient time for appropriate public response?

Do you feel it appropriate for these companies who have so much to gain monetarily, to have a position (either directly or through conflict of interest) on committees deciding or making recommendations concerning these issues?

“If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.” … Thomas Jefferson

Please read the following written by a very concerned citizen. TLB is proud to publish her commentary and promote her ideas and ideals. This woman is a shining example of activism for all who share these beliefs!


Solicitation of Comments on the Draft National Adult Immunization Plan

Contributed to TLB by: Christina G. Waldman

This was my comment as a member of the general public submitted to Ms. Rebecca Fish of HHS. I was requesting a full six months comment period on this draft legislation and expressing my disapproval of any “master plan” on the part of our “federal” or “national” government to promote adult vaccines, especially for pregnant women, newborns, and the elderly. This draft legislation appears to be a marketing plan for Big Pharma.



Dear Ms. Fish:

I am a member of the general public, and an attorney in Rochester, New York.

I think there should be a six-month comment period for the general public, as much of the general public still does not even know this plan exists.

With all the money that is spent to promote vaccines by our government, surely there is money in the budget to really publicize this draft legislation to the general public, more than has been done. I do not even see “general public” listed among the stakeholders tabled at the end of the draft legislation beginning on page 45. They should be listed, as they most certainly have a most personal stake in such a plan.

I would also like to know of all conflicts of interest among all
stakeholders, in the interests of transparency.

Not all member of the general public are in favor of Obamacare or of our government’s promotion of vaccines/vaccine industry, OR of the promotion of vaccines to an adult population. I am opposed to all three for many reasons.

How much is this plan going to cost the taxpayers; i.e., general public?

This plan says nothing about the rights to informed consent of all human individuals, including newborns, which requires full disclosure of all risks and benefits of all vaccines.

We already know that safety studies of vaccines individually and given in combination with other vaccines are largely inadequate, and that much more focus needs to be made of that small subset of individuals most susceptible to vaccine damage from serious adverse reactions.

Before the Government goes ahead with pushing even more vaccines on individuals, including the elderly who do not show a strong response to vaccines, we need to address these safety concerns seriously. Instead, our media pushes a propaganda message that vaccines are safe, Dr. Wakefield is evil, and more and more, we are seeing a push for mandatory vaccination.

I would call your attention to two petitions of which I am aware, in which many members of the general public have expressed their strong protest against mandatory vaccination. Not everyone shares your starting assumptions that a from-the-top government health policy pushing vaccination is a good thing.


(with 129, 596 signatures at 4:36 p.m. on 3/23/15).

Stop allowing the violation of our children’s human rights through mandatory and forced vaccinations with or without parental consent

(4,072 signers as of 4:38 p.m. 3/23/15).

Please allow me to incorporate by reference into this comment these many signers, representative of the general public to some extent, though it is doubtful many of them knew of this comment opportunity for this draft legislation.

I request that the emailed comments to Ms. Fish be made available to the public to read, as they are written, as I have seen done with FDA public comment.

Are all aspects of the Administrative Procedure Act being complied with?

I am especially opposed to the promotion of vaccines upon pregnant women and vulnerable newborns. The wisdom to pregnant women when I was pregnant 30 years ago, was to take no drug that was not essentially necessary while pregnant. Surely flu vaccines are not in that category. We have already seen how the hepatitis b vaccine given to newborns has harmed so many. You can see that the safety studies were inadequate.

I am opposed to all humans being used as guinea pigs, especially those most vulnerable such as infants, pregnant women, and the elderly, without full informed consent, which cannot happen with a pregnant woman with regards to her fetus.

Mandatory vaccination would violate the constitutional rights of
individuals to refuse vaccinations on religious grounds and their health freedom to refuse medical procedures and treatments as well.

I would like to know which individuals by name wrote this draft
legislation. If I had more time, I would make more extensive, detailed comment.

Again, I remain opposed to our government’s pushing and promoting of an industry, the vaccine industry, with my taxpayer money.

I am opposed to any plan to promote the vaccination of any individual.

I am opposed to Obamacare in general and to the conflicts of interest inherent in and running rampant through such a plan to promote vaccination.

I find it offensive our government would encourage the development of adult immunization “champions.”Ethical considerations have arisen with such a role being played by vaccine inventor and promoter Paul Offit, for example.

Thank you for considering my comment. I request that the comment period be extended for a full six months and that this draft legislation be promoted broadly to the general public to give the public full opportunity for comment.


Christina G. Waldman


Additional information and sources:

Draft legislation:

The notice of 3/5/15:

Earlier notice with additional information:



5 Comments on TLB Discovers a Shining Example of Activism: Right to Know & Right to Choose … Vaccination Rights

  1. Dear Rebecca Fish at When will you send me an appropriate response to the public comment I submitted to you at HHS on the Draft National Adult Immunization Plan on March 23? To date all I received was an automated notice you were out of the office until March 25. You must be back by now.

  2. Thank you to The Liberty Beacon for republishing my comment!

    When I emailed my public comment to, all I got back was an “out of the office” automated response. Not even a “thank you.” That is a shameful way to treat the public, especially after you have invited comment.

    In contrast, when I have made public comments to FDA proposed regulations, the comments are immediately (as I recall) posted online, with links to your attached documentation, for all the world to read. That commenting is governed by the Administrative Procedure Act.

    Apparently the Affordable Care Act has allowed the bypass of the Administrative Procedure Act, and the rights it was designed to protect, arguably. I found this, but have only just started looking at it.

    Dr. Sheri Tenpenny’s and Barbara Loe Fisher’s videos help explain what is happening, especially with state bills.
    Healthy 2020 with Dr Sherri Tenpenny for #b1less NEWS #CDCwhistleblower

  3. Since this article is about Activism and Vaccines, please take this important ACTION. I have been petitioning the Congress with my legislation for a “VACCINE FREE 2015” and now the petition has 1,000 signatures!

    Please print the text of the legislation below on one sheet of paper (in 8 pt. type) onto a doc and print it out. Fax it to your US House of Representatives Congressman or hand deliver it to their home office and ask them to fax it to the legislative staff person while you wait, or deliver it yourself to DC. Do this soon please. Here is the legislation:

    Proposed Legislation: ”VACCINE FREE 2015” due to 1) Ingredients, 2) Diseases, 3) Intent

    1) TOXIC INGREDIENTS FOUND IN VACCINES: * aluminum hydroxide * aluminum phosphate * ammonium sulfate *amphotericin B * animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain * dog kidney, monkey kidney* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg * calf (bovine)serum * betapropiolactone * fetal bovine serum * formaldehyde * formalin *gelatin *glycerol * human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)* hydrolized gelatin * mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate) *monosodium glutamate (MSG) * neomycin * neomycin sulfate *phenol red indicator* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) * potassiumdiphosphate * potassium monophosphate* polymyxin B * polysorbate 20 *polysorbate 80 porcine (pig) pancreatichydrolysate of casein * residual MRC5 proteins * sorbitol *tri(n)butylphosphate * VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells *washed sheep red blood plus * LIVE VIRUSES * (source, The Physicians Warrantee of Vaccine Safety) and the ANTHRAX Vaccine (approved for testing on Children 1/15/13)

    2) DISEASES FROM VACCINES:* Allergies * Asthma * Attention Deficit Disorder *Autism * Auto-immune Diseases * Blindness * Brain Cell Loss *Cancer * Central Nervous System Damage* Deafness * Developmental Damage *DEATH * Diabetes * Epilepsy * Learning Disabilities * Leukemia * Multiple Sclerosis * Neurological Disease * Organ Disease * Psoriasis * Seizures * Shaken Baby Syndrome * Synergistic Toxicity *SIDS * Total Paralysis * All Diseases in Internal Medicine

    3-A) INTENT: “The Vaccine Hoax is Over” by Andrew Baker…/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of…/
    “Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have
    1. Known the vaccines don’t work
    2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
    3. Known they are a hazard to children
    4. Colluded to lie to the public
    5. Worked to prevent safety studies
    Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US.”
    Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic’s full paper can be downloaded here on pdf format:
    3-B) INTENT: The World Health Organization: commentary by Dr. Rebecca Carley, “1972 WHO Vaccine Memos which reveal nefarious intent:…/print
    1972 WHO Bulletin 47, No 2Memorandas #1 and #2 Virus-associated immunopathology: Animal models and implications for human disease * technically outline the ability to create biological weapons in the form of vaccines that:
    1) First totally disable the Immune System.
    2) Load every cell of the Victim’s body up with Infection.
    3) Switch the Immune System on causing the host to kill themselves in a Cytokine Storm.
    ~ One, Two, Three, Dead. This is a crucial piece of evidence of WHO’s long-term genocidal intentions that could stand in any court of law because these memorandums give the best and fullest explanation of WHO’s affiliated labs (such as the CDC’s) current activities, such as their patenting of the most lethal bird flu viruses, sending that virus to Baxter’s subsidiary in Austria, which weaponized it and sent out 72 kilos to 16 labs in four countries almost triggering a global pandemic.
    ~ For every crime, there needs to be motive, an indication that it was deliberate, planned. The WHO memorandums provide the evidence of just that deliberate, long-term planning to kill people by weakening their immune system by use of the first vaccine, injecting a live virus into their body by a second, and creating a cytokine storm using squalene in a third.”
    ~ The cover-up of these vaccine-induced epidemics is aiding and abetting crimes against humanity.”
    3-C) INTENT/COVER-UP: “At Last! Government Documents Locked Up for 30Years Proving this Vaccine Unsafe (measles) Finally Revealed”…/government-document-vaccine-unsafe
    3-D) INTENT/COVER-UP: “Deadly Immunity” by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

    ~ The USA’s Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is the highest of 34 Countries. The USA injects children with the greatest number of vaccination doses. The country with the lowest IMR gives the fewest vaccine doses to infants. The correlation between the number of doses of vaccines and the death rate of infants is thus apparent as mentioned by Representative Bill Posey at the Autism Hearing in November of2012:
    ~ “Disease Rates of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated” (vaccinated children have up to 5 times the rate of diseases and disorders as unvaccinated children)…/disease-rates-of-vaccinated-vs…/
    ~ Violating The Nuremberg Code:
    ~ Most of the evidence against vaccination has been suppressed by the mainstream media, but is both voluminous and available because Parents of Vaccine Injured and Dead Children have created a multitude of educational forums such as and and as well as Professionals and (each vaccine, the manufacturer, the ingredients and adverse reactions).

  4. I am a parent and a concerned voter. I am appalled at the attack on freedom in regards to vaccines. The risks associated with vaccines has been well documented by the CDC, vaccine reporting fund, and whistle blowers who have lost their careers trying to shed light on the cover ups of the scientific research that says just how great of a risk vaccines are. The AMA and many other large unions are againts vaccine mandates. Countless parents who live with the life destroying effects of vaccines and the suffering they go through day in and day out has been ignored far to long. We need to be heard! It’s our bodies and our right to choose what goes in it.

  5. Vaccines are not assessed for carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, mutagenicity, impairment of fertility, nor are long term safety studies carried out, nor are safety studies carried out for the combination of vaccines which are administered.
    The complete list of ingredients is unknown even to doctors due to trade secrets.
    Doctors cannot predict who will be harmed by a vaccine and cannot guarantee that those who have been vaccinated will not get infected or transmit infection
    Informed consent implies that adequate and relevant information is accessible. Informed consent is therefore an impossibility.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.