ER Editor: Celia Farber also picked up this story, with a framing comment. Readers may not be aware that VSD stands for Vaccine Safety Datalink, run by the CDC. Dr. Meryl Nass first.
Steve Kirsch also picked up this story, handling it in a different way:
BIG NEWS: CDC, FDA Flag Early Signal of Stroke Risk With Bivalent COVID Vaccine
IT CAME OUT ON FRIDAY NIGHT OF A 3 DAY WEEKEND which is proof they wanted to bury it
This is huge news, because the VSD database that produced the red flag for ischemic strokes (which comprise 80% of all strokes and are due to blood clots) has been analyzed by CDC in a manner that prevented it from showing red flags in the past.
No red flag for myocarditis, heart attacks, sudden deaths, Bell’s palsy, etc. In other words, they are using a bum algorithm or method that is designed to miss adverse event signals. Eventually CDC stumbled on a myocarditis signal in this database, but missed all the other obvious diagnoses. So if they are using the same crude technique and found strokes, that means there were a great deal of strokes, many more than would have been expected as the baseline rate.
Furthermore, the VSD is considered an active surveillance database of high reliability, which includes the medical records of 12 million Americans.
This announcement probably means that not only are the bivalent vaccines worthless, but they are also considerably more harmful than the earlier, monovalent vaccines, which is something I warned about on September 6 when they were rushed out. There was something very spooky about the CDC and FDA hiding of safety data on them, back then. Here is the story from totally pro-narrative MedPage Today:
One surveillance system detects potential link in seniors, yet multiple others show none
by Ian Ingram, Managing Editor, MedPage Today January 13, 2023
An early signal of stroke risk was detected in older adults who received Pfizer-BioNTech’s bivalent COVID-19 vaccine, the FDA and CDC announced in a joint statement late on Friday, yet the agencies found no link in further analyses and are not recommending a change in COVID-19 vaccination practice.
According to the agencies, incidence of ischemic stroke in CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) among individuals 65 and up in the 21 days following vaccination with Pfizer’s bivalent booster “met the statistical criteria to prompt additional investigation” when compared with the 22-44 days thereafter.
However, subsequent analyses of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services database, and a preliminary study of the Veterans Affairs database turned up no signal for an increased risk with either Pfizer or Moderna’s bivalent vaccines, both of which were first authorized in late August.
Furthermore, Pfizer-BioNTech’s global safety database detected no signal for ischemic stroke with their updated vaccine, nor have surveillance systems from other nations.
“Often these safety systems detect signals that could be due to factors other than the vaccine itself,” the agencies stated. “All signals require further investigation and confirmation from formal epidemiologic studies. When one system detects a signal, the other safety monitoring systems are checked to validate whether the signal represents an actual concern with the vaccine or if it can be determined to be of no clinical relevance.”
The CDC and FDA noted that confounding factors may have contributed to the signal identified.
“Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal in VSD represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public, as we have in the past, when one of our safety monitoring systems detects a signal,” they noted.
These and other data from vaccine safety systems will be presented at an already-scheduled January 26 meeting of FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, according to the statement.
Covid Narrative Hits Iceberg: CDC & FDA Admit Stroke Risk Signal From Bivalent Covid Shots; Will Now INVESTIGATE, Meryl Nass: “Huge News”
Also, Dr. Aseem Malhotra Says Covid Vaccines Kill People, Including His Father, On BBC
They can’t ignore it any longer…
We are now 45 to 90 days from this experiment being canceled. And then the CDC will claim they acted responsibly.
Sorry, but I can’t forget that the @CDCDirector mocked us for curing our COVID-19 with Ivermectin, saying we were taking horse meds https://t.co/UQgvsk0SOC
— Rob Schneider (@RobSchneider) January 14, 2023
Dr. Meryl Nass on the CDC announcement: “This is huge news.”
ER: See Farber’s concluding video of Martha Stewart …
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.