Central Banks Are Obviously Determined To Cut… Or Make You Think They Are Going To…

Central Banks Are Obviously Determined To Cut… Or Make You Think They Are Going To…

By Michael Every of Rabobank

The bigger ‘Bigger Picture’

Fed Chair Powell noted the FOMC will wait for a clearer signal from the data before starting rate cuts, which he continues to expect to begin “at some point this year.” In particular, he said that recent inflation data have not “materially changed” the bigger picture.

Battered bonds liked that message, bull flattening the curve; the US dollar, however, continues to batter many EM (and DM) FX, requiring higher, not lower, rates in response. Gold shone slightly brighter at a brief new high of $2,300, while Brent just failed to get back to a 9 handle at $89 and change at its intra-day high.

teaser image

The latest data Powell dismissed were mixed. ADP employment was 183K vs. 150K expected, with a 10% y-o-y wage gain seen for job switchers: I recall a bond bull telling me in 2021 that they would believe inflation was back only if we got real pay-rises. Yet the ISM services survey was softer than expected and its prices paid component dipped to its lowest for four years and the employment sub-index remained below 50, showing job losses. That’s as goods inflation seemed to loom according to this week’s US ISM manufacturing survey.

To summarize, there was no material change to a US big picture which doesn’t make a lot of sense to many observers. Meanwhile, in Europe the opposite above-target CPI dynamic was confirmed, where services were stubbornly high at 4% y-o-y and the only crutch was goods deflation in food (not energy, which often drives food prices with a lag), and some industrial products (i.e., imports from China). Yet despite that big picture, the ECB has been even more dovish than the Fed in its recent statements.

Central banks are obviously determined to cut – or to make you think they are going to cut. It’s hard not to notice that rococo gilded frame if you take a step back to take it all in – which gold is very obviously doing. Yet the bigger ‘big picture’ is arguably that short of an economic downturn that no central bank expects, cutting rates could perhaps risk triggering a material, inflationary move higher in asset and commodity prices. Indeed, if real demand is going to pick up, which is the point of lower rates; and if financial speculation is going to pick up, which is why the market is focused on lower rates; and if the supply of some key goods and commodities is going to be an issue, then how does that rate-cuts = higher supply-side inflation backdrop not risk transpiring?

It would cause a major market shock if rate cuts didn’t happen; or if rates were cut anyway “because reasons/debt sustainability/populism slash elections.” But just because central banks can’t say this, as it would show the limits of what they can and can’t do in the real world, and those in markets who want higher asset prices obviously won’t, doesn’t mean it can’t hypothetically be the case. Indeed, the real world is still out there, and it’s very real right now.

  • Nick Timiraos, the Wall Street Journal Fed Whisperer, shares otherwise obscure Dallas Fed research (‘Lower interest rates don’t necessarily improve housing affordability’) showing housing affordability would also have worsened since 2022 if the Fed hadn’t hiked, because home prices would have gone up more: so while higher rates made unaffordability even worse, the alternative, via lower rates, is still going to be higher house prices – which is inflationary in multiple ways. And you heard that argument here first, every few weeks for the past few years, by the way – and it applies to all Western economies, not just the US. (**cough** Australia ** cough**)
  • US Treasury Secretary Yellen told China the US is going to “shield new industries” against it. So, US protectionism / mercantilism / industrial policy, another long-time call here, which is inflationary even before we get any ‘Trump Tariffs’.
  • Relatedly, The Hill has a (very political/lobby-friendly) op-ed underlining government regulation, however well-intended, can be inflationary: in this case, they suggest recent measures to remove ‘forever chemicals’ from US water supplies could push up the price per household by $3,000 annually.
  • China’s restrictions on exports of gallium are pushing prices up to the highest since 2011.
  • Taiwan’s earthquake has disrupted chip production at TSMC: this may only be a blip, but it underlines how despite talk of supply-chain resilience, some key products still flow from very few hands.
  • In the Middle East, talk is of the risks of war between Israel and Hezbollah, and that Iran might respond to the recent attack on its Damascus consulate with an outright attack on Israel from its own territory, triggering a response in kind. Israel is now calling up reservists to its air defence units, underlining the perceived threat. Such inflationary fat tails would wag many central banks if seen.
  • On oil, OPEC+ supply restrictions are to stay; reports say 14% of Russia’s refining capacity has been taken out by Ukrainian attacks so far; and the US has had to back off plans to refill its Strategic Petroleum Reserve because prices are now too high – so it doesn’t have much of an SPR the next time it might need it.
  • Cocoa continues to be the new crypto, as Arabica coffee is trying to copy its beverage friend short term, with very low world stocks.

Finally, in a related bigger picture of far more importance to central banks and financial markets than either wants to admit, the US is hardly inspiring geopolitical shock and awe in those willing to deliberately restrict supply of key goods and commodities to ensure the West can’t play the ‘low-rates/QE, and you give us your stuff’ game again. US President Biden’s on/off frailties are hardly news, but now…

US National Security Adviser Sullivan has postponed a planned trip to Saudi Arabia to discuss Saudi normalization with Israel, because he cracked his own rib in a “minor accident of his own” which “was not caused by anybody.” Which sounds like the kind of things that the White House press secretary keeps having to say.

US Secretary of State Blinken was forced to abandon his Boeing 737 plane due to another technical issue with it, and instead take a long drive to a key NATO meeting. Our Fed-watcher Philip Marey, as sharp with his wits as he is with his Fed calls, quipped that perhaps reporters are stealing parts from official White House planes now, not just memorabilia.

*********

(TLB) published this article by Michael Every of Rabobank at posted at ZH

Header featured image (edited) credit: org. Rabobank post at ZH

Emphasis added by (TLB)

••••

••••

Stay tuned tuned…

 

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*