FACT CHECKING THE “FACT CHECKERS” ON ILLEGAL ALIENS
“Outing” Orwellian fake news
On Monday, February 11th I was a guest on a radio show, “The Americhicks” on radio station KLZ to discuss a Feb 4, 2019 CBS News article, The facts on immigration: What you need to know in 2019– CBSN fact-check on immigration.
The CBS article ostensibly responded to nine questions about immigration raised by President Trump. I was asked to weigh in about the honesty and accuracy of the “Facts”published by CBS to discredit what the President had said.
I reviewed the article during the weekend that preceded that show and found that falsehoods permeated this supposed “fact-check on immigration.”
Unfortunately this sort of deceptive “reporting” is all too common.
By understanding how to unravel the tapestry of lies contained in this article will provide a methodology that can be brought to bear to critically analyze all supposed “news” articles.
To begin with, the late criminal defense attorney Johnnie Cochran remarked at the O.J. trial, “If you can’t trust the messenger, you cannot trust the message.”
Voltaire wisely said, “You should judge a man’s intelligence by the questions he asked.” The trick is to devise the incisive questions that provide you with the insight you need to determine whether the material you are reviewing is honest or propaganda.
The CBS News article quoted a number of organizations that provided the supposed “Facts” that were used to counter what President Trump said. The first issue is to find out who these sources (messengers) are. It is particularly helpful to find the organization’s website online and review its mission statement. It may be posted under “About” or “About Us” at the top of the website.
The first source quoted in the CBS article was the Center For Migration Studies. Here is how its mission statement (under “About” on its website) begins:
The Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) is a think tank and an educational institute devoted to the study of international migration, to the promotion of understanding between immigrants and receiving communities, and to public policies that safeguard the dignity and rights of migrants, refugees and newcomers.
Simply stated, this organization is not an objective think tank but a biased advocacy group that seeks to increase the numbers of aliens admitted into the United States and is determined to quash any objections about the influx of aliens irrespective of how they enter the United States.
The CBS article used information provided by CMS to answer the question: How do most unauthorized immigrants enter the United States?
The answer provided in the CBS article was described as a “Fact”
Fact: Two-thirds of the recent unauthorized immigrant population entered the U.S. on valid visas, then stayed in the country after that visa expired.
This supposed “Fact” was provided to oppose the construction of the border wall, claiming that since so many aliens don’t run our borders, we don’t need to build the wall.
In reality, the actual number of illegal aliens in the United States is unknown. Therefore it is impossible to determine what percentage of illegal aliens entered the U.S. by evading the inspections process at ports of entry vs the number of aliens who violate their visas.
Recently Harvard and MIT conducted studies that showed that although it has been estimated by many organizations that there are about 11 million illegal aliens, the number, according to the university studies may be double that number or even higher.
For more information about this issue, check out my recent article: Twice As Many Illegal Aliens In US According To MIT.
Additionally, on February 8, 2019 ABC News reported: Border arrests up 85 percent over same period last year: US Customs and Border Protection.
In fact, on February 11th I participated in a discussion on Fox & Friends First about the latest statistics provided by CBP.
Fox News posted the video under the title, A new report reveals the problem at the border is only getting worse: Retired INS agent Michael Cutler weighs in on the crisis at the southern border.
No matter what the actual statistics are, given the huge number of illegal aliens present in the United States and the now routine onslaught of a human tsunami in the form of an endless succession of “caravans” of illegal aliens flowing northward from Central America to the United States, the percentage of illegal aliens who enter the U.S. without inspection is certainly great enough to be considered a true crisis that poses a threat to national security and public safety that must be effectively dealt with.
This brings us to the second question in the CBS News article, the actual number of illegal aliens who are present in the United States.
The sources quoted by CBS in response to this question were the Pew Research Center and the Migration Policy Institute. Both organizations have historically attempted to downplay the magnitude of the immigration crisis.
The eye-opening OIG report about the allegations of malfeasance of this program was published and is well worth reading.
INS Commissioner Meissner had an adversarial relationship with the special agents of the INS and was hostile towards immigration law enforcement justice.
On May 4, 1999 the House Immigration Subcommittee conducted a hearing on the Designations Of Temporary Protected Status And Fraud In Prior Amnesty Programs.
John F. Shaw, the former Assistant Commissioner for Investigations, Immigration and Naturalization Service, testified at that hearing. His testimony about his frustrations with Doris Meissner provides insight into her hostility to immigration law enforcement.
Here is an excerpt from his testimony:
In its determined efforts to establish control of the border by tightening security on the perimeter, Congress has seemingly ignored the critical, complementary roles and responsibilities of Interior Enforcement . . . and these fall mainly on the shoulders of Investigations.
I believe that the concept of Interior Enforcement, supported by a well articulated strategy document, ought to be as familiar in the nomenclature of immigration enforcement as the concept, or term, Border Control. Although, I must admit that even in-house at INS, the Commissioner has said that Interior Enforcement is a term of usage invented by Investigations and devoid of meaning.
The CBS article also made much of how the majority of drugs are seized at ports of entry and therefore more needs to be done to prevent smuggling through ports of entry and not be concerned about the amount of drugs that are smuggled across the border between ports of entry.
The fact is that we don’t know what we don’t know. Obviously, DEA has no way of knowing the total amount of narcotics that is successfully smuggled between ports of entry. There is no shortage of heroin in the United States and therefore with all of the seizures made by CBP at ports of entry, huge quantities are still getting into the U.S. Clearly open borders must be considered as a serious threat to the integrity of our efforts to interdict smuggled drugs as well as smuggled aliens.
The article additionally asks the absurd question, “Is asylum a form of illegal immigration?”
The article then provides the assertion:
Fact: No. “If you are eligible for asylum you may be permitted to remain in the United States.” Source: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Of course, while filing for any immigration benefit does not constitute “illegal immigration”, lying on such applications and therefore committing fraud is a felony.
The issue of asylum fraud was, in fact, the focus of a November 21, 2013 Washington Times news report, “Mexican drug cartels exploit asylum system by claiming ‘credible fear.’”
The CBS article ignored that the majority of applications filed by aliens from Central America are denied and that immigration fraud was a key concern of the 9/11 Commission. That was the predication for my article, Immigration Fraud: Lies That Kill–9/11 Commission identified immigration fraud as a key embedding tactic of terrorists.
The CBS article claimed that the majority of aliens who applied for asylum attended their hearings. They did not, however, divulge how many aliens whose applications were denied subsequently absconded and failed to depart from the United States.
The CBS article also asked (and answered):
Do illegal immigrants commit more violent crimes than legal residents?
Fact: Studies say that undocumented immigrants are less likely to commit violent crimes than American-born citizens.
My article, Illegal Immigration And Crime: The stunning numbers the Left cannot refute includes this excerpt:
President Trump’s Executive Order on Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to collect relevant data and provide quarterly reports on data collection efforts. On Dec. 18, 2017, DOJ and DHS released the FY 2017 4th Quarter Alien Incarceration Report, complying with this order. The report found that more than one-in-five of all persons in Bureau of Prisons custody were foreign born, and that 94 percent of confirmed aliens in custody were unlawfully present.
Here is an excerpt from the press release that provides some quick statistics and a paragraph that addresses the lack of information about aliens in city and state facilities.
A total of 58,766 known or suspected aliens were in DOJ custody at the end of FY 2017, including 39,455 persons in BOP custody and 19,311 in USMS custody. Of this total, 37,557 people had been confirmed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to be aliens (i.e., non-citizens and non-nationals), while 21,209 foreign-born people were still under investigation by ICE to determine alienage and/or removability.
Among the 37,557 confirmed aliens, 35,334 people (94 percent) were unlawfully present. These numbers include a 92 percent unlawful rate among 24,476 confirmed aliens in BOP custody and a 97 percent unlawful rate among 13,081 confirmed aliens in USMS custody
This report does not include data on the foreign-born or alien populations in state prisons and local jails because state and local facilities do not routinely provide DHS or DOJ with comprehensive information about their inmates and detainees—which account for approximately 90 percent of the total U.S. incarcerated population.