GMO’s Benefit No One but Multinationals Like Monsanto

“The  only ones to benefit from GMOshave been the  multinational biotechnology firms that patented them. Having conquered a growing  slice of the global market for highly-monopolized seeds, their goal is long-term  profits, indifferent to the impact on the environment, public health, or family  agriculture.”


Monsanto  in Brazil: Facing growing opposition from family farmers

and  the courts.

By Marijane Vieira Lisboa ~ Brazil – Opera Mundi

In a contemporary remake of the Malthusian argument, the  proponents of GMOs allege that they are necessary to  ensure food to a world population on the rise in the context of ever-shrinking farmland.

Serving as a subsidiary argument is the theory that herbicide-tolerant,  pesticide-resistantGMOs would avoid the use of  greater quantities of pesticides, and that GMOs resistant to drought would allow  for the adaptation of plants to the climate changes now  underway.

If that isn’t sufficient, proponents still hang their hats on so-called “good GMOs” – plants that are “engineered” to provide  greater amounts of vitamins, other vital nutrients, and even vaccines, resolving  the problem of poor populations without access to food and  medication.

But just as Malthus was defeated by history – because humanity today produces much more food than in the past, having grown at rates never anticipated – current demographic studies show a clear tendency of the planet’s population toward  stabilization in the coming decades. First world countries today have  diminishing populations, and even countries like Brazil show fertility rates  below what is necessary to replace the population.

Malthus-text_picReverend Thomas Robert Malthus: His theory about the limits of food production and the inevitable decline in populations have been dis-proven before. So why are biotech companies like Monsanto still defending themselves with Mathusian arguments?


 (Video) Monsanto Mafia’: U.S. court backs GMO giant against farmers on seed patents

So what about the promised reduction in the use of pesticides? To the dismay of all who work in the public health sector, over recent years, Brazil has become the largest consumer of pesticides on earth. And the situation is likely to  worsen, because due to the well-known development of pesticide resistance in  invasive plants, glyphosate– the most widely-used pesticide with  transgenic soybeans – is no longer effective.

The“solution” found by biotechnology companies are new GMOstolerant to 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, a relative of the herbicide Agent Orange, which was  used by the North Americans in Vietnam. The National Biosafety Technical  Commission is about to release genetically-modified soy and maize that are  tolerant to 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid.

Finally, so-called “good GMOs,” which serve essentially a propagandist role, will be a hard sell. It has proven impossible to convince  easterners to eat several bowls of “golden rice” every day, just  as it doesn’t make sense for research to concentrate vitamins in certain foods,  instead of trying to ensure the right of everyone to an adequate and balanced  diet.

In addition to Brazilian agribusiness, the only ones to benefit from GMOs  have been the multinational biotechnology firms that patented them. Having  conquered a growing slice of the global market for highly-monopolized seeds,  their goal is long-term profits, indifferent to the impact on the environment,  public health, or family agriculture.

Ten years after the commercial release of GMOs in  Brazil – Monsanto’s Roundup-Ready soybeans, thanks to a provisional measure from the Lula government – it is  high time for the country to begin demanding serious scientific research to  assess the harm GMOs have had on health, the  environment, and family agriculture.


La Jornada,  Mexico:Monsanto and DuPont-Pioneer  Threaten Food Security in Mexico

Le Monde,  France:U.S. Diplomats Force-Feed  ‘Frankenfoods’ to Unwilling World

La Jornada,  Mexico:WikiLeaks ‘Spills Beans’ on  U.S. Push for ‘Frankenfood’

Like  Worldmeets.US on Facebook

*Marijane Vieira Lisboa, sociologist, professor at PUC-SP, member of the National BiosafetyTechnical Commission, representative of consumer  entities

TLB recommends you visit WorldMeets.US for more great/pertinent articles and information.

See original featured article here:


Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.