ER Editor: We’ve published a few stories referencing the secretive, Parallel Universe that the biowarfare laboratories globally constitute (400 of them worldwide with 13,000 scientists, often located in iffy countries where our laws don’t apply), and that Covid-19 may have been produced in a lab. We’ve also published about the curious timing / geography of appearances of new lung cases (Covid-19 or not) which calls into question the highly suspicious, Deep State ‘it’s a Chinese virus’ narrative. Kudos to Marine Le Pen for having the nerve to raise this topic publicly.
We also take this opportunity to note that accurate detection of a very specific virus requires a very specific test, none of which currently exist. Covid-19 is, to many doctors, mostly (not 100%) presenting like another case of the ‘flu, so what is being ‘measured’ and reported as ‘cases’ here? See Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for ANY Strain of a Coronavirus, Not Specifically for COVID-19 [VIDEO]. We’ve all got lots of coronaviruses inside us at any given time. The French government is about to begin using the serology test, which, as this article above mentions, does not even test for virus.
The story about Marine Le Pen’s comments were picked up by MSM outlet Le Figaro yesterday, with the obligatory mention of ‘conspiracy’. Otherwise, it doesn’t seem easy to find this story. Below is Sputnik News’ version. Happily, a significant enough number of French people aren’t buying the official line.
We remind readers that the made-in-a-lab theory is indeed just that. We also remind readers of the various viruses that have also been lab-made or claimed to be, such as Lyme and Zika. Doctors back in the early ’80s, when AIDS was getting going, were saying that the human body could never produce the HIV infection by itself, for example. Here is the list of relevant articles on the lab hypothesis (we especially recommend the first and the one with Dr. Francis Boyle):
-
Was Coronavirus a Biowarfare Attack Against China? A Veteran Insider Speaks Out
- (A 2nd useful article is referenced in here) COVID-19: Further Evidence that the Virus Originated in the US
-
IT’S OFFICIAL: Chinese Scientists Find A Genetic Explanation for Coronavirus Discriminating By Race
- (Despite the titled, more strains of what is being called Covid-19 have been found) COVID-19 Has 2 Strains, First Case of Neurological Damage Reported – Chinese Scientists
-
India To Probe Wuhan Institute Of Virology; Dr. Francis Boyle – Coronavirus is a Bio Weapon [VIDEO]
-
Event 201 Unfolds: Covid-19 Action Platform = Global Government [VIDEOS]
********
Marine Le Pen Says It’s Reasonable to Question If COVID-19 Was ‘Lab-Produced’
LILIA DERGACHEVA
Citing the example of an artificial, lab-developed virus, the National Rally leader has asserted that it makes sense to doubt any statements about the place of origin of COVID-19.
President of the French right-wing party National Rally Marine Le Pen considers it fair to wonder whether the currently raging coronavirus has artificial origins and was intentionally designed in a lab.
“People’s question about if its origins are natural or whether it is lab-produced is a reasonable one”, Le Pen told the radio station France Info.
The politician, who according to BFM-TV, opted to self-quarantine after allegedly contacting a coronavirus-infected person, went on to note that she personally doesn’t stick to any concrete point of view.
“In history – and I know this because I do my best to be educated – there were a few diseases, which originated in laboratories, for instance, myxomatosis”, the politician remarked.
According to a recent poll, about 40 percent of National Rally voters believe that the virus was really developed “on purpose”, while only 15 percent consider its emergence to be “accidental”.
Speculation has been running high in the media and on social networks over the origins of the novel type of the dangerous coronavirus.
Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas said he was looking into holding China “accountable” for the coronavirus pandemic, later replying to a Twitter message suggesting that “China will pay for this” with one word: “correct”, he commented in the thread.
Earlier in February, Cotton did not rule out the possibility that the coronavirus may have been developed by the Chinese in a “superlaboratory”, assuming that the damage from the virus could be “worse than Chernobyl”.
A Chinese official, in turn, has alleged that the US military may have shipped the coronavirus to Wuhan. “When did patient zero begin in US? How many people are infected? What are the names of the hospitals? It might be US Army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan”, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian wrote on Twitter, while the authorities circulated the statement dismissing the US senator’s claims.
CONTINUE READING HERE
Published to The Liberty Beacon from EuropeReloaded.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply