By:  TLB Staff Writer  |  David-William

April 28, 2016

Here, below is a view from someone who is an Attorney, but unfortunately for him, nowhere on this continent is a real School for law.  Those are on England.  Although there is Common Law here, very few know how and where to find and use it.  It’s all about the Constitution and/or Contract.  UNITED STATES isn’t a Nation!  It’s a foreign Corporation.  “STATE OF…” is part of the same Corporation.  They’re in CITY OF LONDON folks!  The Crown Temple B.A.R. is in CITY OF LONDON, also!  The Courts are not courts!  They’re Bankruptcy Administrators.  They’re the biggest compilation of JACKASS JUDGES on the planet, working under the Rothschild I.M.F. Banks.  U.S. is under U.N./I.M.F. Organization.  Each and every time a Sewer Rat in the Black Robe of Saturn/Satan acts as Executor De Son Tort with your ALL CAPS legal name JOHN. H. DOE, he’s propagating COUNTERFEIT SECURITIES, without your permission, or really, by embezzlement.  

Get it?  They do not work for free!  :john-henry: doe is the secure creditor, who is the full faith and credit for the bankrupt UNITED STATES, and he has a transmitting utility called JOHN H. DOE, but the guy at the Bank/Bench is a broker who STEALS from john-henry by holding him as surety for the fictional DEBT.  So the B.A.R. is a bunch of Pirates, and while they’re at it, they’re after your kids!  Your kid is not a CHILD.  Your kid is your property.  Are you getting it yet?  ARE YOU GETTING IT?  

The JOHN HENRY DOE on the Birth Certificate is NOT YOU!!!!  The guy  the Bench/Bank is NOT a Judge!  Courts are Banks/Brokerage Houses, dealing in COUNTERFEIT SECURITIES for the Crown-Vatican-Swiss Banking Cartel.  They’re enslaving you, which is barratry, press-ganging, land-piracy, and it’s done by people with NO LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY to be there.  They’re not allowed in the Courts!!!  They NEED YOU to be STUPID!  They’re suckering your consent.  They’re stealing your kids!  They’re monetizing your Estate Trust, by making you think you’re the DECEDENT!  

Dorothy stepped out of her house after it fell from the tornado into the COLOR OF LAW!  She put on Silver Slippers in the book!  Silver is a real Dollar!  The Munchkins told her to follow the YELLOW BRICK ROAD!  Yellow Bricks are GOLD!  to the Wizard of OZ.  Ounces!!!!  Stick with REAL MONEY, Dorothy!  As she traveled down the Gold path in her Silver slippers, who was the first “PERSON” – “CHILD” “INDIVIDDEL” she ran into?!?!?  The STRAWMAN!!  The DECEDENT!!!  The DEAD ENTITY!!  None other than JOHN HENRY DOE.  Dorothy locked arms with that INFANT – U.S. CITIZEN!!!    Oh no!!!!  NO!!!!  That’s how she wound up with the T.I.N. MAN!!!  T-axpayer I-dentification N-umber!

By law, they can’t tax the living woman or man, but they sure can tax the STRAWMAN!!  Here it comes!  I’ve been prepping you in my articles for long enough!  Now it’s time to separate the wheat from the chaff!  Ready!?!

If someone asks you if you’re a U.S. citizen, and you say yes?  One last chance:  The Bailiff calls:  JANE DOE!!  JANE DOE!!  Is that you?????

Congratulations!  You just entered into a contract with the Crown Temple B.A.R. confirming that you are the INCOMPETENT IMBECILE!!!!

That’s right folks!  If you claim to be a U.S. citizen, which you cannot be, you are the STUPIDEST BUFFOON you have ever met!!!!

O.K!?!  The cushy, comfy world of denial is all over!  Only a total JACKASS thinks they’re a U.S. citizen.  If you still think you are, you committed pseudo-cide.  You have made it to the tippets top of the Darwin Awards contest.  Darwin was WRONG!  There’s no such thing as evolution.  

MAN IS STILL AN APE!!!  You prove it every day.  The greatest slave plantation in the world is your thick, impenetrable skull.  You think you’re free because there’s plenty of room for your pea-sized bird brain to roam around up in there!!!  Is that an echo you hear when you call out to the DEAD!  Wow, huh?  O.K!!!   Read carefully!  Read and read and read again and again until it gets through that granite cocoanut you think is your head.

(“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873). Plaintiff Hereby deposes and states the facts herein. [From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access] [DOCID:chapter_txt-5] [[Page 73]] Nationalities, etc.

Were you created by Congress????  

” ‘in common usage, the term person does not include the sovereign people, and statutes employing the (word person) are normally construed to exclude the sovereign people.’ Wilson v Omaha Tribe, 442 US653 667, 61 L Ed 2d 153, 99 S Ct 2529 (1979) (quoting United States v Cooper Corp. 312 US 600, 604, 85 L Ed 1071, 61 S Ct 742 (1941). See also United States v Mine Workers, 330 US 258, 275, 91 L Ed 884, 67 S Ct 677 (1947)” Will v Michigan State Police, 491 US 58, 105 L. Ed. 2d 45, 109 S.Ct. 2304 b)

“The sovereign people are not a person in a legal sense” In re Fox, 52 N. Y. 535, 11 Am. Rep. 751; U.S.v. Fox, 94 U.S. 315, 24 L. Ed. 192.

Pay attention!  When a cop, or the SPLC, or the ADL calls you a “sovereign citizen,” he just told you that HE IS A JACKASS PARROT!!!

Corporation. A corporation is a “person” within meaning of equal protection and due process provisions of United States Constitution. Allen v. Pavach, Ind., 335 N.E.2d 219, 221; Borreca v. Fasi, D.C.Hawaii, 369 F.Supp. 906, 911. The term “persons” in statute relating to conspiracy to commit offense against United States, or to defraud United States, or any agency, includes corporation. Alamo Fence Co. of Houston v. U. S., C.A.Tex., 240 F.2d 179, 181.


“A “US Citizen” upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in “interstate commerce”, as a “resident” does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914) 

“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v. Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873) 

“Therefore, the U.S. citizens [citizens of the District of Columbia] residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an “individual entity.” Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773.

Shhhhh!!!!   Just between you and I, our own little secret, I promise not to tell anyone; after all the weeks and months you’ve been reading these undeniable facts, if you still claim that you’re a U.S. citizen, you’re STUPID!  Shhhhhh!  I won’t tell!  Only YOU will know!

HA HA HA HAAAAAA!  I lied!  The criminal creep in the B.A.R. Attire with the Black Robe who deals with the DEAD lied to you too.  Or did he?  

HA HA HA HAAAAAA!  I lied to you again!  He knows you’re DEAD, because when he called YOU, you means you and the DEAD, oops, YOU is plural, YOU answered for the DEAD PERSON!!!  

It looks like you have to ways to look at this.  YOU really are DEAD, or you really are stupid, or both!  

HA HA HA HAHAAAAA!  YOU lied to YOURself this time!  

When YOU, DEAD, the STRAWMAN meat without a BRAIN, (“If I only had a BRAIN!”) answer to the ALL CAPS LEGAL NAME that YOU both see on the DRIVER’s License, you became ONE with the DEAD.  The only way you can accomplish that is to have YOUR head soooooooo faaaarrrr up YOUR own butt, you can see out YOUR own eyes.  That’s the in and out of it!

Here comes the insult to the injury!  The B.A.R. Agents, FOREIGN AGENTS in in the Black Robes rob you, because YOU’re the TAXable CORPORATION, INCOMPETENT IMBECILE, they take quiet notice of the fact that you’re simply STUPID.  

Don’t you dare tell yourself that I’m mean!  I’m the one trying to awaken the DEAD.  You offed yourself and worse, you can’t seem to awaken.  Im trying to stop you from hurting yourself, but for now, you belong in the rubber room with the long-sleeve sport jacket in that lovely shade of CLINIC WHITE.  

Now read this AGAIN.  Do you see the word “PERSON” in there?  

New-Hampshire State Republic – Part the First [ Bill of Rights ]

[Art.] 10. [Right of Revolution.] Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.

[Art.] 30. [Freedom of Speech.] The freedom of deliberation, speech, and debate, in either house of the legislature, is so essential to the rights of the people, that it cannot be the foundation of any action, complaint, or prosecution, in any other court or place whatsoever.

[Art.] 31. [Meetings of Legislature, for What Purposes.] The legislature shall assemble for the redress of public grievances and for making such laws as the public good may require.

June 2, 1784
Amended 1792 generally rewording sentence and omitting “for correcting, strengthening and confirming the laws.”

[Art.] 32. [Rights of Assembly, Instruction, and Petition.] The people have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer.

Are you getting this, yet?  This is why the B.A.R. Courts are robbing your eyes from you, because the DEAD have no standing in law.  This is why the B.A.R. populates your “government” because you claimed to be a U.ASS. citizen.  U.ASS. citizens are DEAD and without status and are not the people, so you are UNDER the ATTORNEY GENERAL, who is the “corporate responsible person” for all UNITED STATES entities, and this is why you are TOO INCOMPETENT as the WARD OF THE STATE, which means you do NOT have the right to REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.  You are their property by your very own consent.  You are STILL an ape.

There is no “Judicial Branch” and there is no government.  It’s all, 100% Executive, Administrative, Military, Martial Law Rule.  That Gold Fringe Amity Commerce Corporate Banner isn’t a flag!  It’s a Corporate Banner in a State of Emergency.  Everything under gold is in the water, in bank-rupt-sea, with no money.  All you have is elastic, fiat current-sea.  A U.S. citizen, the INFANT-VESSEL is presumed DEAD, lost at SEA.  That’s why the INFANT-VESSEL was abandoned at it’s BERTH, DEAD in the water.  You mother, bearing her MAIDEN VOYAGE name broke her WATER, then you passed down her BERTH CANAL,  He has black footprints on the back of his BERTH CERTIFICATE, because he touched land (the living baby) once and he’s the lost soul.  

The Corporation Soul, the Pope, marries the Sea.  All lost souls are his.  He deals in the DEAD.  He’s the head of the Church of the Holy See (sea).

Are you getting it yet?  The Crown Temple B.A.R., The Inns of the Court, are in the Crown, CITY OF LONDON, not the furniture on the stupid Queen’s head.  The Crown is owned by the Vatican.  

ARE YOU GETTING IT, YET?  The Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorner in the Black Robe of Saturn/SATAN, is the High Priest of Ba’al/SATAN, and he’s claiming the SALVage of the abandoned SOULS lost at SEA.  The Bench is the Bank, where you washed ashore.  He deals with the DEAD, “ALL RISE!”  That’s why they call YOU to “APPEAR” to board the PIRATE GHOST VESSEL.  the DEAD APPEAR.  

The Crown Temple B.A.R. is under the Jesuits.  The Jesuits run the FEDERAL RESERVE.  That’s where your BERTH CERTIFICATE belongs.  UNITED STATES is a slave colony.  They brought the Admiralty Maritime Law of the SEA on the land.  If you’re still in doubt, you’re still in troubled waters.


NH Redress Of Grievances Committee Excoriates Family Judiciary

August 23rd, 2012 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

It’s the best of states, it’s the worst of states. Among family court reform advocates, New Hampshire is widely known as one of the very worst states in the nation if you’re a father trying to assert his parental rights in a custody case. The unfettered power with which Marital Masters, judges, Guardians ad Litem, etc., go about the business of separating fathers from their children is something to behold. Many times I’ve listened  to fathers describing officials whose actions seem completely arbitrary and limited by no apparent rules of evidence, procedure or due process. They sound to me more like feudal lords than judges. As an attorney who’s used to basic things like notice of hearings, production of evidence before a judicial decision and the like, I was at first hesitant to believe what I was hearing.

But now it seems that, in one way at least, New Hampshire is the best of states. That’s because it still hangs on to the concept of the rule of the people. In an age in which everyday people find themselves further and further from the corridors of power, New Hampshire has something called the House Committee on the Redress of Grievances. As the name indicates, it’s a committee of the state House of Representatives. It hears citizens complaints about public officials, decides whether they’re founded or unfounded and recommends action by the full house. Sometimes it recommends that the official in question be impeached. Ain’t democracy grand?

Here, here, here, here and here are the findings and recommendations on five complaints made to the Committee. All five concern the behavior of family court judges and other court personnel; all five complaints are deemed “founded” and all five contain recommendations for action by the House, some of which are truly far-reaching.

By all means read the five. Each is short, but together they paint a portrait of a family judiciary that clearly believes it can do anything it wants any way it wants to anyone it wants with no concern for consequences. Leave a group of four-year-olds alone in the sand box long enough and you’d see the same type of behavior. These people don’t care about the law, they don’t care about due process, they don’t care about evidence, and they certainly don’t care about children. If this weren’t New Hampshire, I’d call it the wild West.

The first example is about a Guardian ad Litem named Tracy Bernson.

[T]he Committee finds that the Petitioner was wrongly denied by the Family Division all visitation with his child contrary to N.H. law and his constitutional rights for approximately 13 months. This wrongful situation was due to: Guardian ad Litem Tracy Bernson who: 1. Made unlawful recommendations to the Court in her 2/11/11 guardian ad litem report including suspension of all visitation with his son with no findings of fact that it would be detrimental to the child and with no findings of abuse or neglect contrary to RSA 461-A:2; 2. Posited as fact the psychological condition of the minor child without being an expert herself, and with no expert psychological findings or report, and apart from any testimony that is the product of reliable principles and methods contrary to RSA 516:29-a; 3. Recommended the imposition of extrajudicial conditions on reunification contrary to RSA 461-A:2, RSA 461-A:6 and contrary to the presumption that fit parents are presumed to act in the best interests of their children; 4. Recommended unlawful prior restraint of Petitioner’s free speech by restricting him from talking with his son about the subject of love (see RSA 461-A:6 I(a); 5. Recommended as a condition to see his son, that Petitioner enroll in a parenting class and separately in individual therapy which is contrary to the Troxel presumption that “fit parents are presumed to act in the best interests of their children,” (Troxel v. Granville, 530 US 57)…

Here’s the Committee’s take on Marital Master Nancy Geiger:

The Committee finds that Marital Master Nancy Geiger also contributed to this when she: 1. Conducted a hearing that affected Petitioner’s parental rights without proper judicial notice per Duclos v. Duclos, 134 NH 42 – NH: Supreme Court 1991, quoting Morphy v. Morphy, 112 N.H. 507 – NH Supreme Court 1972[1]; 2. Wrongfully recommended the suspension of Petitioner’s visitation and parental rights with no findings of abuse or neglect and no expert testimony; 3. Compelled Petitioner to finance the “therapeutic reunification” with his son in a forced contract contrary to Hale v. Henkel 201 U.S. 43; 4. Utilized what she knew to be false and/or incomplete GAL report testimony of GAL Tracy Bernson in arriving at her decision; 5. Refused to admit Petitioner’s properly authenticated telephone logs as exhibits at trial;

What were the Marital Masters in the Manchester Family Division up to? They “inexplicably and arbitrarily” bankrupted a fit father by ignoring the laws that would have allowed him to keep a little of his money instead of paying it to his ex as alimony. Having themselves violated many laws, they then jailed him for his inability to pay their wrongful orders.

The Redress of Grievances Committee listened to the testimony and saw the supporting documents of a Petitioner who in the process of a divorce case found himself suffering from numerous inexplicable, and arbitrary acts at the hands of the Family Division which have not only reduced him to virtually no income to support his home family but has wrongfully jailed him for inability to pay. Despite never being adjudicated an unfit parent he has been denied all contact with his children for nearly three years without any order of the court preventing such contact in violation of his fundamental parental rights and contrary to NH RSA 461-A:6, (Best Interests of the Child); NH RSA 633:1-A and 633:3-A and 633:4, (Interference with Custody); and, the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Specifically, the Committee finds that Manchester Judicial Branch Family Division Marital Master Leonard Green: 1. Made an incorrect and confiscatory order (see RSA 458-C:2 IV c) that has reduced Petitioner to near financial ruin, violating NH Child Support Guidelines, and improperly awarding unnecessary alimony per NH RSA 458:19 and 546-A:5 (Uniform Civil Liability for Support); 2. Failed to comply with NH RSA 461-A:VI a (Parental Rights and Responsibilities). (See also NH Constitution Art.35. [The Judiciary; Tenure of Office]); and 3. Failed to consider the mandatory self-support reserve in RSA 458-C IV and the support for others mandated in RSA 546-A:5(g)…

The judges have a nasty little habit of ignoring laws, rules of procedure and evidence, and then, when a father tries to protest, simply refusing to give him a hearing. Without a hearing, there can be no transcript; without a transcript, there can be no appeal. So in one case, they appointed a Guardian ad Litem who by law is limited to a fee not to exceed $1,000 unless she gets approval from the court following a hearing. But the judge ignored all that. When the GAL submitted a fee application exceeding $12,000, it was approved, the father was ordered to pay it all, and his numerous requests for a hearing were simply ignored. And of course the judge refused the father all contact with his daughter for almost three years despite no finding of unfitness.

The Committee understands what fathers know all too well, but no one else in the state wants to admit:

[T]he resulting effect generally [has] been court order[ed] child abuse in the denial of her access to a loved parent for the period of two years. This has become a common report before this committee:that the Family division of the court, established to protect children , actually inflicts the injury on the child itself.

That’s right, “court ordered child abuse” by the family court. When the Committee got around to recommending action, it’s clear that the members saw the extent of the injustice that makes up so much of the daily workings of family courts in the state. Here are a few of its recommendations.

3. introduce legislation to enable each parent in a divorce to have the appointed GAL permanently dismissed without cause at least once. 4. Amend the statutes to allow citizens party to a case to enter into private prosecution of perjury and false swearing;

(1) Investigate Judge John Arnold for impeachment for offending the dignity and undermining the integrity of the courts and the confidence of the people, for failing to uphold the laws of the State of New Hampshire and for infringing on the natural and Constitutional rights of the petitioner; (2) Require that Rules of Evidence, Rules of Procedure, and all other Rules of the pertinent Court(s) be complied with by all judicial courts; (3) Require that all motions and petitions brought before a court of New Hampshire be docketed immediately and scheduled to be heard within six months after docketing;

4. To eliminate increases in or extensions of alimony pursuant to a final decree and when the receiving party has falsified evidence; 5. To make punishment mandatory in cases of false swearing and perjury by officers of the court in the Family Division,

4. Permit courts to deviate from equal parenting time distribution only in cases where there is clear and convincing evidence of abuse or neglect by one or both parents or it is requested by party receiving the lesser proportion of time;

Who would think it necessary for a committee of the legislature to instruct courts of the state to follow the rules of evidence and procedure? Who would guess that perjury and false swearing would be such a routine and accepted part of everyday court practice, or that orders would be issued with no evidence to support them? What person walking the streets of New Hampshire would know that some of the worst violators of law are its family court judges and masters?

Fathers, that’s who. Fathers know these things all too well, and now the members of the Committee for the Redress of Grievances know it too.

By the way, it’s noteworthy that the Committee called for the legislature to amend the state’s laws to require a presumption of shared parenting.

Thanks to David for the heads-up.


Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.