Rigged impeachment, contempt for due process
By: David Zukerman
With the Senate “trial” on the House impeachment of former President Trump just underway, CBS News has come in with a poll asserting that 56 percent of Americans favor conviction, with 44 percent opposed.
According to CBS:
A new CBS News poll finds 56% of Americans say the Senate should convict former President Trump in his upcoming impeachment trial. CBS News director of elections and surveys Anthony Salvanto joins CBSN AM to break down the results.
CBS News thus seems intent on re-enforcing Republican complaints that the Democrats are throwing not only caution, but due process as well, to the winds in their rabidly partisan zeal to crush private citizen Trump for all time — along with his supporters.
Imagine Mr. Trump, following acquittal in the Senate, were to be indicted in a criminal action — in Anywhere, U.S.A. Would CBS News announce a poll, on the first day of that trial, stating that 56 percent of Americans feel that private citizen Trump should be convicted. Seems so — notwithstanding that such a poll would be about as fair as the guilty verdicts handed out during the French Revolution, sending thousands of victims to the guillotine.
Since when do our juries hand down guilty verdicts with the reading in court of the indictment. This is comparable to the undue process practiced by CBS News in asserting that the 56 percent of the American people have determined at the outset that private citizen Trump stands convicted as charged. One hesitates to ask the anti-Trump zealots if they understand what a bill of attainder is — and that their “trial” violates the Constitution’s ban on bills of attainder. If they feel free to act against Mr. Trump, the way the Queen of Hearts acted against Alice, dispensing with the need of a fair trial before convicting, how can they possibly understand what a bill of attainder is?
But didn’t Alice respond to the Queen’s adverse and unfair ruling by declaring something to the effect, “you’re just a bunch of cards”?
It is, alas, not to be expected that Mr. Trump’s attorneys respond to the utter disgrace of this “trial” and the CBS News poll, to boot, by declaring:
“…this is just a charade, having nothing to do with jurisprudence nor with political fair play, and we will not participate further — let the Republican senators do their duty to the Constitution, to our legacy of liberty, and act in solidarity to put an end to this attempt at Soviet-style justice.”
Besides, what kind of “fair play” is it to enter, as the lying Democrats did, Mr. Trump’s remarks of Jan. 6 in the record without including his call for a peaceful demonstration, to offer for the record a twisted, prejudicial version of the events at the Capitol that day, to leave the impression that the former president had any responsibility for the tumult.
The New York Times is free, under the First Amendment, to accuse anyone defending Mr. Trump’s quarrel with the results of the 2020 presidential election of making “baseless claims.” If the Democrats were honor-bound to seek “Truth Unto Its Innermost Parts,” as the Brandeis University motto states, this sham of a proceeding, let alone the twisted process employed, would never have taken place, because this “impeachment” rests on “baseless claims,” along with the four years of the anti-Trump resistance, including Russia-gate and Impeachment I.
For nearly two years, the country, along with President Trump, was subjected to a Mueller probe based on lies, deception, and undue process. But isn’t another special prosecutor engaged in a probe of Russia-gate? While the Democrats and their media advance guard take pains to destroy our justice system, equating accusations with findings of fact, what on earth is happening with John Durham’s investigation? Or is this special prosecutor under house arrest — to be charged with being an agent of the anti-Christ Trump?
There is a Yiddish word that 44 Republican Senators should shout asap from the Capitol’s steps: “Genug!” (Enough.)
The above article (Rigged impeachment, contempt for due process) is republished here under “Fair Use” (see the TLB disclaimer below article) with attribution to the articles author David Zukerman and website americanthinker.com.
TLB Project recommends that you visit the American Thinker website for more great articles and information.
Read more articles and blog-posts by David Zukerman.
Read more articles about Impeachment 2021
Stay tuned to …
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.