Speculations and What Ifs

 By: Joseph M. Lenard

[Yep, you may have guessed, another piece spurred by social-media discussion(s).]

Speculations, Hypotheticals, Paranoiac Pre-Panics about Possibilities/Potentials, and What Ifs… Remember the ole “if my Aunt were born Male would be my Uncle instead” line (which, yes, with today’s Gender-confusion idiocy, takes new Life)?

I understand and agree that speculations and “what ifs” are best to avoid as responses/dodges to topic discussions…. As, yes, and I have indeed used such arguments to point out Leftist hypocrisy, double-standards, and “Rules For Thee But Not Them” applications we see all the time today. So, yes, occasionally they become necessary counters to Leftist attacks on those on The Right – like the clear double-standards of attacks and often made up shit about Don Trump Jr. and the WELL LOOK AT HUNTER (and the actual facts and evidence of his Crimes, and the entire #BidenCrimeFamily, with no real action).

Now, yes, they try point to the current Hunter Gun Trial, but does anyone actually think it is in earnest?!?! It could have, should have, been undergone long ago. Look at all the other Charges should have been filed against Hunter (and other BiDUMB’s) that clearly the Leftist DeepState system dragged its feet on to conveniently “allow” Statutes-of-Limitations to run-out (meanwhile, purposefully, willfully, malice of forethought, change NY Law to try turn “alleged” book-keeping questions into “an extended time-frame-extension so-as to then be able to Charge former President Trump in Lawfare Election interference efforts. Which, of course, brings questions of Ex Post Facto Law applications Appeal SCOTUS needs here (as because if someone, anyone, does something LEGAL at time or Statute run-out, The Left can just change or create NEW LAW to then use against their Political enemies (Banana-Republic manure) but that is whole other rabbit-hole). And, yes, the NJ Senator and Gold Bars payoffs corruption – that another “but look, we apply Rule-of-Law equally” dodge as Menendez had developed a conscience of late and not toeing the #Fascicrats Party line 100% of time anymore and they want him replaced. These are all SELECTIVE APPLICATIONS, Politically and Power motivated…

Where was I before I side-tracked alternate rabbit-holed again? “speculations and what ifs are best to avoid as responses/dodges.” However, this is not that. What ifs when it comes to potential POLICY discussion to hash through thoughts can be beneficial.

Many “speculating” or “asking” if #Trump indeed becomes #POTUS47, could and/or should he #PARDON himself in response to the #NY Charges Conviction idiocy… My #reasoned #logic why NO (whether could or not aside, should? NO)!

1) #PrinciplesNotPersonalities – I do not like, do not want, the #PRECEDENCE and potential mis-use another #POTUS could use it in/for/with. #simple #principled

2) The #NY #BananaRepublic #Lawfare farce need go through #Appeals (and all way into #SCOTUS) and those engaging in that manure SLAPPED DOWN (as NY #Lawmakers and #Courts have been over and over for pathetic clear UnConstitutional actions/activities over and over again – call them out, put their farce on FULL DISPLAY of being SMACKED DOWN yet again). That too, if not done this way, if it allowed to be “glossed over and more-or-less be ‘left in place’ if a Pardon bypasses proper order/hearings” would allow yet another BAD #PRECEDENCE to be set otherwise.

There is ALREADY too many BAD #LAWS and/or #PRECEDENCES allowed (and other and more BAD #LAW created and piled up upon such Precedence that could, would, should, be smacked down EARLY in a process, not 30, 40, 50, years later; after so much damage could be done (like Leftist Judges in lower Courts using Roe that even #Ginsberg admitted DID NOT set an “Abortion Right” Precedent to create Laws and lower Activist Rulings as if it had and need for a Dobbs reversal far earlier)) set by #SCOTUS not dealing with enough Cases a year they should.

And, yes, another side rabbit-hole, it is always SPECULATED whether 3^rd Party Candidates cost so-and-so an Election and usually I REJECT such. Like Gore crew blaming Nader. Like many HWBushers STILL trying to blame Perot. However, studies really show, both those cases anyway, those Voting for the “other 3^rd Party” were people that would have otherwise NOT VOTED (entirely, or planning on skipping the POTUS part of the Ballot) and therefore really did NOT affect overall Electoral College outcome. What about 2020? The Libertarian Candidate (and more on them coming) in a few key Battleground States, made a difference?!?!?

Putting aside all the Fraud stuff – the 2020 Election STILL really came down to about 45,000 Votes in just a couple key States that could have shifted the outcome (again, we use Electoral College, NOT popular Vote and doesn’t matter how you “run up the Counts” in some States, but the results of the Battleground States (again, POTUS LEVEL) to determine outcome (yes, running up counts via cheating ANYWHERE can and does effect USHouse and USSenate Race outcomes, talking POTUS Race here)! Now, obviously, NOT ALL LIBERTARIANS if Joe wasn’t on Ballot would have bothered to Vote and Voted GOP ticket. I AM JUST SAYING, as I have in several BeforeItsNews #Election2020recap pieces, actual analysis not just wild speculations and WISH IT WOULD HAVE BEEN feelings based manure, that if just 1-3% of those in those KEY STATES would have, it still could have swayed that Election (but, yes, again, had they, with all the Count shenanigans, The Left could have maybe just manufactured the additional Votes to still overcome that shift). So, again, why the SPECULATIONS and WHAT IFS are often NOT ALL THAT HELPFUL (never can, never will, be able to factor all factors).

VIDEO (52m 17s): CTP (S2E54) “ CTP (S2E54, 20240629) ’Speculations and What Ifs’ BTS/SP Video”

Regarding #LIBERALtarians… From my LOCALS social-media feed…

YOU AWAKE YET – How are some STILL SLEEPING?!?!? I’ve been saying (over 2 decades, I used to interact with some REAL LIBERTARIANS back when) Libertarian Party been moving Leftward… more-so late including on my CTP Show, Savaged Unfiltered, Maverick News (Canada), more/elsewhere, and some just thought I was being HYPERBOLIC, that #Libertarians haven’t been such for 2 decades now – THEY’RE #LIBERALtarians (mostly about POT issue their they want to get High anytime, anyplace, and IF they ruin their (via Pot and escalation to other even more destructive Drugs) own Lives (unlike real Libertarians past, about Smaller Govt, ending Welfare State) they all about YOU having take care of them). Well, some FINALLY AWAKENED to that Reality now that they (as a Party) OFFICIALLY NOMINATED ULTRA-LEFTIST GAY HAMAS-TERRORISTS HUGGER (OpenBorders and YOU as Taxpayers having to take care of them, again – so much for INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY and SMALLER GOVT) as their nominee! THANK YOU for so blatantly PROVING MY POINT, PROVING ME RIGHT!

And lastly, back to the whole TRUMP going forward speculations. As I said on LOCALS…

OK, just ACT 2 concluded in the very PREDICTABLE (Lawfare) Play.
Time to Appeal, where another Leftist Activist Judge will ignore #RuleOfLaw, #Constitution, #Precedence, etc., also!
So we can RUSH IT to the SCOTUS for real Hearing and quick OVER-TURN based on COUNTLESS violations “Appeal” reasons.

AND LET the Leftists on SCOTUS Rule POLITICALLY rather than LEGALLY……. LET THE LEFT KEEP PUSHING AND EXPOSING THEMSELVES AS THE #FASCICRATS THEY ARE!!!

As the saying goes, they eagerly manufacture The Rope by which they will be HUNG (figuratively speaking)!

So, how has “Speculations and What Ifs… Remember the ole ‘if my Aunt were born Male would be my Uncle instead’ line (which, yes, with today’s Gender-confusion idiocy, takes new Life)” fared against my other pieces?!?! LOL. You know many times I say about how ODD and DIFFERENT some my pieces can be!!

••••

About the Author: Joseph M. Lenard was a former writer for Super Simple Computer Enterprises, REDSTATE, Grassfire, and Rattle With Us – MI TEAParty (where he was Writing Committee Chair) and others. Joseph is a current content provider at Before It’s News and The Liberty Beacon. He is also the Author of: “Terror Strikes: Coming Soon to a City Near You”!

Joseph Martin Lenard (@JLenardDetroit)
author: Terror Strikes (buy)
Former 12CDRC, Wayne12, WCRC, Committees member
W12 Newsletter Editor Wayne-12CDRC Newsletter
MICD12GOP MI 12th CDRC Webmaster
Taylor (MI) Republicans Club TRC Michigan Webmaster
Terror Strikes book (B4IN write-up)

Image Credit: Graphic in Featured Image (top) –Pixabay License.

(Click on image to find out more)

Terror Strikes video Trailer:

••••

Stay tuned to …

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.