Supreme Court says Biden can’t end Trump-era ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy for migrants

Supreme Court says Biden can’t end Trump-era ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy for migrants

DHS vows to ‘vigorously challenge’ ruling

The US Supreme Court has ruled that President Joe Biden cannot halt the Trump-era “Remain in Mexico” policy, which forced migrants to await immigration proceedings outside of the US, calling its prior attempt to do so “arbitrary.”

(RT-USA News)  In a brief opinion on Tuesday, the court determined that the federal government can not legally put an end to the immigration rule, first implemented under then-president Donald Trump in 2019, upholding a previous decision by a federal judge in Texas. Three liberal justices – Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, dissented to the ruling.

Besides those in dissent, the justices said that Biden’s attempt to rescind the immigration rule in June was “arbitrary and capricious,” barring it from going through with the move.

Somewhat ironically, the court cited a 2020 ruling which prohibited Trump from ending an Obama-era policy – the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program – arguing that Trump ran afoul of procedural rules set out for such policy changes. That same reasoning is now being applied to Biden, who has vowed to overhaul virtually all immigration policies implemented under his predecessor.

Responding to the ruling, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said it “regrets that the Supreme Court declined to issue a stay,” vowing to fight the decision while also saying it would comply for now.

“DHS has appealed the district court’s order and will continue to vigorously challenge it. As the appeal process continues, however, DHS will comply with the order in good faith,” the agency said.

Formally known as the “Migrant Protection Protocols,” the “Remain in Mexico” rule was initially suspended in January when Biden first took office, and later rescinded in June. The rule applies to any migrant who left a third country and traveled to the US border through Mexico, and has kept tens of thousands seeking asylum or citizenship out of the United States while they await official proceedings.

Biden’s DHS said in June that it would allow migrants turned away from the border under that policy to try again in the US, though the fate of those individuals is again in limbo following Tuesday’s SCOTUS ruling.

In Texas alone, some 32,000 migrants were denied entry while the rule was in effect, according to data compiled by Syracuse University. Many were rejected after they were unable to appear for their court dates on the US side of the border due to the policy, leaving them in something of a catch-22.

US officials previously said they weren’t sure how many migrants would reapply for asylum after the rule was initially – and temporarily – abolished earlier this summer, but experts with the International Organization for Migration suggested it could have been as many as 10,000.



Biden administration to allow denied asylum seekers to reapply in US as Trump-era ‘remain in Mexico’ rule ends

Federal judge strikes down Obama-era immigration policy, bars new DACA applicants but allows current enrollees to stay in US


(TLB) published this article from RT-USA News

Header featured image (edited) credit: Migrants expelled from the United States walk towards Mexico, escorted by US Border Patrol agents/ ©  Reuters / Jose Luis Gonzalez



Stay tuned to …


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.