There’s a Huge Difference in Someone Dying “Of” Covid & “With” Covid …

There’s a Huge Difference in Someone Dying “Of” Covid & “With” Covid …

By TLB Staff Writer: Dan Asmussen

On his deathbed Louis Pasteur said “Bernard was correct. I was wrong. The microbe (germ) is nothing. The terrain (milieu) is everything.”

Louis Pasteur (1822 – 1895) was a French chemist and microbiologist born in Dole. He is best known for his remarkable breakthroughs in the causes and prevention of disease. His experiments supported the germ theory of disease. In essence, Pasteur taught that disease came from outside the body in the form of bacteria. For Pasteur, to fight illness is to treat the symptoms with a vaccination. This approach has shaped modern medicine and pharmacology.

The two most celebrated achievements in Pasteur’s career:

1) His bold public demonstration of a vaccine against anthrax in sheep at Poully-le-Fort in 1881.

2) The first known application of his rabies vaccine to a human subject, young Joseph Meister, in July 1885.

In the first case, Pasteur deliberately deceived the public and the scientific community about the nature of the vaccine used in the experiments at Poully-le-Fort.

In the second case, the nature of Pasteur’s deception is less clear-cut, but here too I find some striking discrepancies between the public and private versions of the famous story of Joseph Meister.

By 1885, five years after starting work on rabies, Pasteur and his colleagues had developed a live viral preparation, which, Pasteur claimed, not only protected dogs from rabies infections, but prevented the disease from becoming symptomatic if administered post exposure.

Still, it was not without reluctance—or concern from his peers—that he agreed to administer a series of viral injections to the asymptomatic young Meister. “This will be another bad night for your father,” wrote Pasteur’s wife Marie to their children during the treatment. “He cannot come to terms with the idea of applying a measure of last resort to this child.”

But it seemed to work—Meister didn’t develop rabies. And after starting treatment of another boy that October, Pasteur declared the vaccine a success before the French National Academy of Medicine. The story became international news; even patients from America were soon shipped over to Europe to receive the miracle cure.

Pasteur’s secretive attitude further fueled his opponents. His papers were only three or four pages long. There were no details, and no way you could reproduce to prove the efficacy of the vaccine.

Nearly a century later, in the 1970s, Pasteur’s laboratory notes (in the possession of his heirs until then) were made public. They revealed startling discrepancies between Pasteur’s research and his claims: although he had tested a vaccine on dogs, the concoction administered to Meister was made using different methods, essentially untested in animals. Its seeming success was the result of an educated guess and proved, just like today, that there are NO scientific evidence or experiments that showed that you can cure disease with disease or vaccinations. This would qualify as a definition of insanity and reveals the dark sinister side of Louis Pasteur and the vaccine fraud that has been going on for over 130 years.

For over a century now, the focus in health and medicine has been almost 100% targeting on treating symptoms rather than prevention and the treatment for underlying causes. With this mindset, millions of people will happily smoke, overeat, drink alcohol, not exercise, get flu vaccine shots and lead an utterly acidic and destructive lifestyle in the knowledge that there is probably a fairy tale drug or a vaccine out there if anything really goes wrong.

Pierre Jacques Antoine BéChamp (1816 – 1908) was a French medical doctor, biologist, contemporary of Louis Pasteur. He believed that a completely healthy internal fluid environment would be immune to harmful bacteria and that only when the body became a welcome host for this bacteria. (i.e. when our cells become weak from an acidic lifestyle or toxic internal fluid environment)

Disease is Born In Us and From Us

We do NOT ‘CATCH’ sickness or disease we ‘DO’ sickness and disease with how we live, where we live, what we eat, what we drink, what we breathe, what we think, what we feel and what we believe. Some people are offended with this statement and the contextual or internal environmental theory because it shifts responsibility to the person who is tired, sick, obese, or cancerous, rather than using ones self-inflicted dis-eases as an excuse to shift the blame on a non-existent phantom germ or virus like, HIV, Ebola, Hantavirus, Zika virus, SARS COVID-2, SARS COVID-19, Polio, etc. for their pain and suffering.

Bottom line is most if not all sicknesses and diseases are the consequence of personal choices that leads to the over-acidification of the interstitial fluids of the Interstitium organ (the largest organ of the body). The interstitial fluids surround every cell that makes up every gland, organ and tissue. The interstitial fluids are the dumping ground for acidic metabolic, dietary and respiratory waste of the intracellular and intravascular fluids. It is the primary purpose of the Interstitium organ to remove these acidic wastes out through the lymphatic system. If this does not happen on a daily basis toxins can build up causing decompensated acidosis and the genesis for all sickness and disease.

We All Have Viruses, All The Time, as Part of our Virome and Immune System

The humble virus is deeply misunderstood. The human body is composed of an estimated 6 trillion cells, 60 trillion bacteria and 380 trillion viruses. Just as we have a microbiome of friendly bacteria which forms the basis of our immune system and 2nd brain in our gut, so too do we have a virome (a collection and community of viruses) which play a role in our healing. Through the ascendency of germ theory over host theory/terrain theory, the mainstream paradigm now teaches that viruses are “bad guys”, infectious agents “out there”, who can invade the body – thus reinforcing the need for Big Pharma drugs and vaccines.

Viruses come from exosomes or tiny particles our bodies produce. They are not infectious agents. The exosome theory states that if cells are poisoned, they produce viruses (secretions) to clean up the toxins. This is what the plant kingdom does; when a tree has a beetle infestation, it makes a hormonal secretion to tell other trees to defend themselves.

Thus, Operation Coronavirus is not only a fake pandemic, but also a colossal and unprecedented worldwide psyop, based on exploiting our ignorance over the true nature of viruses.

Fake Tests for a Fake Pandemic

Insiders and whistleblowers such as the one in the article “Insider Exposes COVID-19 Coronavirus Scam” have revealed how there are coronavirus test kits being distributed which don’t even test for the specific SARS-CoV2 strain! They just test for generic coronavirus (coronavirus is defined as the “common cold” in medical encyclopedias) which of course will produce more false positive (as the NWO agenda dictates).

Meanwhile, the Medical Industry relies on the PCR test which I have exposed in other articles as wholly inadequate. The PCR Test is a surrogate test since it doesn’t actually isolate the virus. The founder of the PCR test Kary Mullis admitted that you can’t use PCR to prove infectious etiology or to diagnose an infectious disease. Besides, you can manipulate the results PCR will yield by choosing how many cycles (amplifications) to run. For some diseases, if you lower the number of cycles to 35, it can make everyone appear negative, while if you increase them to above 35, it can make everyone appear positive.

The COVID-19 umbrella term has been used in an absolutely unscientific, manipulative and deceptive way to justify this manufactured coronavirus crisis, which the evidence shows is a fake pandemic. The international lockdown which covers around 100 nations and at least 20% of the world right now is based upon the idea that there is a new distinct virus SARS-CoV2 which is spreading, infecting and causing the disease COVID-19. However, there are many key foundational questions which cannot be adequately answered.

The most important of these is that the virus itself has never been isolated nor thoroughly proven to be causing the disease (or more accurately diseases) that people have! This is in addition to the obvious manipulation of the figures with false positives and other sleights of hand such as inflating the numbers by counting anyone who merely had the virus as “dead from” the virus.

The coronavirus fails Koch’s postulates. The Emperor has no clothes – and all the power grabs and emergency decrees for lockdowns are based on lies. We are not looking at 1 virus, 1 cause and 1 disease; we are looking a cluster of diseases and a variety of causes, hidden by the COVID-19 umbrella term to fuel the fake pandemic narrative.

German scientist Robert Koch (Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch, 1843-1910) made great contributions to the field of microbiology. He is considered to be one of the founders of the field of modern bacteriology. He identified the specific causative agents of TB (tuberculosis), cholera and anthrax. For his work on TB, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1905 in Physiology or Medicine. Koch established 4 criteria to identify the causative agent of a particular disease. These criteria have become a gold standard for determining the existence of an infectious agent and for isolating and verifiying what is causing a disease. The criteria are a set of conditions known as Koch’s postulates. They are:

1. The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.

2. The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture.

3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must cause disease.

4. The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host, and found to be identical to the original microorganism.

Firstly, the coronavirus SARS-CoV2 (allegedly causing the disease COVID-19) has not been shown to be present only in sick people and not in healthy ones. There are countless cases of people having this virus with mild, minor or zero symptoms. Recently Iceland tested a relatively large percentage of its population (around 5,000 people out of 364,000) and found that 0.86% (close to 1%) of Icelanders had the coronavirus. The symptoms? Little or none:

“Importantly, approximately half of the people who tested positive for COVID-19 are non-symptomatic, according to Gudnason as reported by BuzzFeed. The other half is mostly showing “very moderate cold-like symptoms.””

Secondly, the virus has never been isolated – which must be done with proper equipment such as electron microscopes and which cannot be achieved through CT scans (as the Chinese were using) and the flawed PCR test (more on this below). The January 24th 2020 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine entitled A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 describes how the scientists arrived at the idea of COVID-19: they took lung fluid samples and extracted RNA from them using the PCR test. It admits that the coronavirus failed Koch’s postulates:

“Further development of accurate and rapid methods to identify unknown respiratory pathogens is still needed … our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates.”

Now let’s talk about the Nasal Swab PCR test they use to determine if someone had Covid:

Kary Mullis, the inventor of the RT-PCR (Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction) test, or PCR test for short, explained why the PCR test is not especially diagnostic, for Covid, HIV, or for anything else:

“Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron. PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to Covid, HIV, etc… The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”

The PCR test is qualitative not quantitative. It can isolate a genetic sequence but it cannot measure or determine viral load or the quantity of a virus needed to prove it is causing a particular disease.

The PCR tests for genetic sequence. It cannot prove causation.

The PCR test is unreliable as the results can be manipulated due to the arbitrary number of amplifications/cycles chosen. In theory, the tester can show whatever result they want it to show based on the choice of cycles.

The CDC (US Center for Disease Control) itself admits that a positive coronavirus COVID-19 test (using the PCR method) doesn’t mean the virus is causing the disease/symptoms you may have! These are the actual words of the CDC ?

“Positive [test] results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.”

In essence, the PCR test cannot confirm that ANYONE tested positive for COVID 19 or determine that it was the cause of death in the first place. There’s a huge difference in someone dying “of” Covid and “with” Covid.

Just because you have some genetic material from a sick person doesn’t mean it is pathogenic… especially when you can find it in healthy people. That’s like saying we identified the spare tire as the cause of the fatal accident because we found them in both cars.