Truth in Media: Vaccine Court and Autism

Contributed to TLB By: Ben Swann, Thuth In Media.

The claims that autism is caused by vaccines have been completely disproven,  right? We have all heard that claim, maybe most famously by actress and model  Jenny McCarthy.

But is the claim untrue? What if I told you that while HHS says there is no  link between autism and vaccinations, the federal government has quietly awarded  families of autistic children damages as a result of vaccine injuries?

The first step toward truth is to be informed.

The story we are talking about today is something that just doesn’t get  attention from the mainstream media, and on the rare occasion when it does, the  story is predictable. Scandal surrounding a doctor who claims autism and  vaccines are linked. The bizarre parents who believe that their child has autism  because of a vaccine, a claim clearly not based in science.

But is there more to this story than what the media has told you?

The real story behind vaccines begins in 1986.

That is because it was in 1986 when the U.S. Congress created National  Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Now that alone is worthy of a story, because what  most Americans don’t know is that a family who has child injured by a vaccine,  cannot simply sue the vaccine maker. Under this 1986 law, Congress took that  power away from families and instead created a “vaccine court” if you will.

So what is the vaccine court? It is a Federal Claim’s court that deals  specifically with vaccine cases where families can go for injury compensation if  their child is injured by a vaccine. The official name, the Vaccine Injury  Compensation Program (“VICP”). Of course, this program is seen as necessary  because virtually every child who attends a pre-school, daycare or public or  private school is required to be vaccinated.

So what’s the problem?

In 1986 when the VICP was first created vaccine makers were protected from  lawsuit by the public. The VICP insulates vaccine manufacturers from liability  and requires that petitioners bring their petitions solely against HHS. They may  not sue manufacturers or healthcare practitioners. The rationale for this  industry and professional protection was to ensure a stable childhood vaccine  supply and to keep prices affordable.

The 1986 Law also permits the vaccine makers the right to not disclose known  risks to parents or guardians of those being vaccinated. Based on something  called the “learned intermediary” doctrine, manufacturers bear no liability for  giving, or failing to give, accurate or complete information to those  vaccinated.

In exchange for being subject to the vaccine court, families of those injured  would be compensated through an administrative process based on a table of  presumptive vaccine injuries.

At its outset, 90% of claims were “on table.” But almost 30 years later,  things are very different. Today, the vaccine schedule, meaning the list of  vaccines offered to children has tripled, but the table of injuries has become  much more restrictive, forcing 90% of petitioners into “off-table” litigation.  And it gets worse. Because for families who believe that their children have  been injured by vaccines, there are enormous roadblocks to overcome when seeking  compensation for those injuries.

Mark Blaxill is the father of an autistic child. A child who he says has been  injured by vaccines. Blaxill is part of a group called the Canary Party, a  coalition of parents who are pushing for changes to the system through political  means.

Blaxill: The Canary Party is a social movement that’s created to stand up for  the victims of medical injuries, environmental toxins, industrial foods, the  things that care causing these new health crises and epidemics that we are  seeing.

Swann: Let’s talk about this issue of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program  because most Americans, I would guess have no idea that this even exists.

So for parents, like Blaxill, why does he believe the Vaccine Injury  Compensation Program has failed?

That goes back to 2002 when nearly five thousand families filed petitions  with the VICP claiming that vaccines had caused their children’s neurological  disorder called “autism.”

According to the Pace Law Review, in an unprecedented proceeding, the VICP  created and conducted the Omnibus Autism Proceeding that concluded in 2010. That  means instead of taking the cases one at at time, they consolidated hearings for  all these families. in the end, the VICP dismissed all the “test case” claims of  vaccine-induced autism.

Blaxill: The original intent of the VICP was to provide a no fault, generous,  rapid program of compensating victims. Now what we have a is a cover up. And a  situation in which the government is trying to say, these things which people  think they have observed, not only are we going to discount it, we are going to  treat it with prejudice. We are going to say…

Swann: That this person is trying to get over on the system, that they are  gaming the system.

Blaxill: That they are gaming the system, they are trying to blame, they are  trying to get money from the government and that’s just wrong.

But there is more… A Review of Compensated Cases of Vaccine-Induced Brain  Injury finds that The VICP has compensated approximately 2,500 claims of vaccine  injury since the inception of the program in 1986.

Since that time, despite the official ruling that there is no link between  vaccines and autism, there have been at least 83 cases of autism among those  compensated for vaccine-induced brain damage.

Swann: The last thing that I would ask you is that in terms of outcomes what  are you all hoping for? Because this is really a fight for other families, a  fight for an entire generation of Americans, is it not?

Blaxill: We are asking for justice because you have many, many injured  children and families that are struggling and they deserve support. We’re asking  for awareness of this crisis in this health system. We have the worst outcomes  in the entire industrial world here in America. We have the highest cost  healthcare system, the most interventionist healthcare system in terms of  medication and vaccination. We have a dramatic disfunction and we need awareness  of that, that we have a problem and we need to shine a light on that. And then  we need change. We need fundamental renovation of our way of dealing with  parental choice, with the rights of consumers, authority in the healthcare  system. Who gets to choose and then we need to find ways to treat and heal all  those injured children and now adults who are suffering from this system.

What you need to know

Is that on the Department of Health and Human services website is this  statement:

“HHS has never concluded in any case that autism was caused by  vaccination.”

Parents point out that while number and use of vaccines is skyrocketing, the  number of autism cases is skyrocketing as well. But remember, correlation does  not equal causation. Agencies like HHS will say that doctors and medical  professionals are just better at recognizing autism than they used to be and  that may be true. But as one parent told me, while public statements have been  made that there is no research supporting the assertion that vaccines can cause  autism, families point to dozens of studies that do find a link between vaccines  and autism that public health officials do not share with the public. And that  families would like to present in a civil court, before a jury, which believe is  their right under the Constitution.

TLB Highly recommends you visit: www.benswann.com for more “Truth In Media”!

See original here: http://benswann.com/truth-in-media-vaccine-court-and-autism/#ixzz2mnnhE18l Follow @: @BenSwann on Twitter