Two United States Constitutions – 1789 – 1871

By: David-William | TLB Staff Writer


Anyone who digs through American history can find the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, when the Crown/Vatican/Swiss Banking Cabal set up to rob everyone of their rights to land, thanks to the Crown Temple B.A.R. Broker/Attorners who made sure to set it all up for their Jesuit Rothschild Lord and Master.  All we have known is war, bankruptcy, and constant struggles with these stinking Banksters and their Lawyers.  A brief account of the history of the end of what we thought was freedom.  It’s still possible to have freedom, but it’s a constant conflict with the loathsome courts.

UNITED STATES Incorporated in England in 1871

UNITED STATES Incorporated in England in 1871 was governed entirely by private corporate law, dictated by the banks as creditors.

The U.S. is a Crown Colony. The U.S. has always been and remains a Crown (Roman Catholic Pope) colony. King James I, is not just famous for translating the Bible into “The King James Version”, but for signing the “First Charter of Virginia” in 1606 — which granted America’s British forefathers license to settle and colonize America. The charter guaranteed future German Roman Catholic Kings/Queens of England would have sovereign authority over all citizens and colonized land in America.

After America declared independence from the Crown, the Treaty of Paris, signed on September 3, 1783 was signed. That treaty identifies the German Roman Catholic King of England as prince of U.S. “Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick (Germany’s Brunswick) and Lunebourg (Germany’s Lunebourg), arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire (Roman Catholic Church) etc., and of the United States of America“– completely contradicting premise that America won The War of Independence.
Article 5 of that treaty gave all British estates, rights and properties back to the Crown – Catholic Church Pope.

The Congress realized that the country was in dire financial straits, so they made a financial deal with the devil – the Crown (a.k.a. City of London Corporation – est. by the Catholic Church on Jan 1, 1855 ) thereby incurring a DEBT to the Pope. The conniving Pope and his central bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a way of taking back control of the United States of America and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia.The people of the 50 Union states together maintain foreign sovereign immunity.  First, an important point needs to be made clear here. IN LAW, a fictitious entity can only deal with another fictitious entity, because only parties of equal standing can communicate in law. Read that again!

The UNITED STATES incorporated in England in 1871, because the default again loomed and bankruptcy was eminent.  So in 1871, the ten miles square was INCORPORATED in England. They used the constitution as their by-laws. Not as authority under the Constitution but as authority over the constitution. They Copy Righted, not only the Constitution but also many names such as, THE UNITED STATES, U.S. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, USA and many other titles as their own. This is the final blow to the original constitution. From here on out, the UNITED STATES was governed entirely by private corporate law, dictated by the banks as creditors.

More Bankruptcy Re-organizations: Then, in 1909, default loomed once more. The US government went to the Crown of England and asked for an extension of time. This extension was granted for another 20 years on several conditions. One of the conditions was that the United States allow the creditors to establish a new national bank. This was done in 1913, with the Federal Reserve Bank. This, along with the 16th Amendment, collection of Income tax, enacted February 25, 1913, and the 17th Amendment enacted May 31, 1913, were the conditions for the extension of time. The 16th and 17th Amendment further reduced the states power. The UNITED STATES adopted the Babylonian system.

The rights of the individual…are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government.” City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944″ A sovereign (the lawgiver) is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal right as against the authority that makes the law on which the right depends.” “A suit presupposes that the defendants are subject to the law invoked. Of course it cannot be maintained unless they are so.” Kawananakoa v. Polyblank (1907) 205 U.S. 349. This is known as the doctrine of Sovereign Immunity. The government uses this all the time to protect itself against lawsuits. They create the statutes, and they only agree to be bound by certain statutes. If as a U.S. citizen, you do not have that right because you are property of the federal government. As a freeborn spirit, an American man/woman, you are the creator of the government, so you are immune from suit, unless you agree to waive this right and enter into a suit. Every time you file an legal action in a court, you agree to be bound by the rules of the court and the statutes of the jurisdiction you are acquiescing to. You waive any inalienable rights you may have and agree to be bound by the statutes. Read that again! Sovereign People defined: the political body, consisting of the entire number of citizens and qualified electors, who, in their collective capacity, possess the powers of sovereignty and exercise them through their chosen representatives [see Scott v. Sanford, 19 How. 404, 15 L.Ed. 691.] Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1396) Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act defined: subject to existing international agreements to which the U.S. is a party, and to certain statutorily prescribed exceptions, a foreign nation is immune from the jurisdiction of federal and state courts. [28 U.S.C. Sec. 1601-1611] Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1396) Read that again! Foreign states defined: Nations which are outside the United States. Term may also refer to another state; i.e. a sister state.

The term “foreign nations,” as used in a statement of the rule that the laws of foreign nations should be proved in a certain manner, should be construed to mean all nations and states other than that in which the action is brought; and hence one state of the Union is foreign to another, in the sense of that rule. A “foreign state” within statute providing for expatriation of American citizen who is naturalized under laws of foreign state is a country which is not the United States, or its possession or colony, an alien country, other than our own. Kletter v. Dulles, D.C.D.C., 111 F.Supp. 593, 598.

Within defined: Into. In inner or interior part of, or not longer in time than. Through. Inside the limits of; during the time of. When used relative to time, has been defined variously as meaning any time before; at or before; at the end of; before the expiration of; not beyond; not exceeding; not later than. Glenn v. Garrett, Tex.Civ.App., 84 S.W.2d 515, 516. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1692)

Without defined: Outside; beyond; in excess of. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1692) Wherever, under any law of the United States or under any rule, regulation, order, or requirement made pursuant to law, any matter is required or permitted to be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath, or affidavit, in writing of the person making the same (other than a deposition, or an oath of office, or an oath required to be taken before a specified official other than a notary public), such matter may, with like force and effect, be supported, evidenced, established, or proved by the unsworn declaration, certificate, verification, or statement, in writing of such person which is subscribed by him, as true under penalty of perjury, and dated, in substantially the following form:(1) If executed without the United States: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).” (2) If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature).”

BY-LAWS defined: Rules and ordinances made by a corporation for its own government. 2. The power to make by-laws is usually conferred by express terms of the charter creating the corporation, though, when not expressly granted, it is given by implication, and it is incident to the very existence of a corporation. When there is an express grant, limited to certain cases and for certain purposes, the corporate power of legislation is confined to the objects specified, all others being excluded by implication. 2 Kyd on Corp. 102; 2 P. Wms. 207; Ang. on Corp. 177. The power of making by-laws, is to be exercised by those persons in whom it is vested by the charter; but if that instrument is silent on that subject, it resides in the members of the corporation at large. Harris & Gill’s R. 324; 4 Burr. 2515, 2521; 6 Bro. P. C. 519. 3. The constitution of the United States, and acts of congress made in conformity to it the constitution of the state in which a corporation is located, and acts of the legislature, constitutionally made, together with the common-law as there accepted, are of superior force to any by-law; and such by-law, when contrary to either of them, is therefore void, whether the charter authorizes the making of such by-law or not; because no legislature can grant power larger than they themselves possess. 7 Cowen’s R. 585; Id. 604 5 Cowen’s R. 538. Vide, generally, Aug. on Corp. ch. 9; Willc. on Corp. ch. 2, s. 3; Bac. Ab. h. t.; 4 Vin. Ab. 301 Dane’s Ab. Index, h. t., Com. Dig. h. t.; and Id. vol. viii. h. t.

A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution And Laws Of The United States Of America And Of The Several States Of The American Union by: John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856
BYLAWS defined: Regulations, ordinances, rules or laws adopted by an association or corporation or the like for its internal governance. Bylaws define the rights and obligations of various officers, persons or groups within the corporate structure and provide rules for routine matters such as calling meetings and the like. Most state corporation statutes contemplate that every corporation will adopt bylaws. The word is also sometimes used to designate the local laws or municipal statutes of a city or town, though, more commonly the tendency is to employ the word “ordinance” exclusively for this class of enactments, reserving “by-law” for the rules adopted by corporations. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 201)

The United States Constitution is an ordinance (or statute) within the Law of Nations. 2. The various State constitutions are ordinances (or statutes) within the United States Constitution, and are a part and parcel of the law of Nations. 3. “Public policy” is within the jurisdiction of the law of Nations. The Law of Nations is the science of the rights, which exist between Nations or States, and of the obligations corresponding to these rights. It will be seen how States, as such, ought to regulate their actions. We shall examine the obligations of a Nation towards itself as well as toward other Nations, and in this way we shall determine the rights resulting from those obligations; for since a right is nothing else but the power of doing what is morally possible, that is to say, what is good in itself and conformable to duty, it is clear that right is derived from duty, or passive obligation, from the obligation of acting in this manner. A Nation must therefore understand the nature of its obligations, not only to avoid acting contrary to its duty, but also to obtain there from a clear knowledge of its rights, of what it can lawfully exact from other Nations.

TREATY defined: international law. A treaty is a compact made between two or more independent nations with a view to the public welfare treaties are for PERPETUITY, or for a considerable time. Those matters which are accomplished by a single act, and are at once perfected in their execution, are called agreements, conventions and pactions. 2. On the part of the United States, treaties are made by the president, by and with the consent of the senate, provided two-thirds of the senators present concur. Const. article 2, s. 2, n. 2. 3. No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance or confederation; Const. art. 1, s. 10, n. 1; nor shall any state, without the consent of congress, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power. Id. art. 1, see. 10, n. 2; 3 Story on the Const. Sec. 1395. 4. A treaty is declared to be the supreme law of the land, and is therefore obligatory on courts; 1 Cranch, R. 103; 1 Wash. C. C. R. 322 1 Paine, 55; whenever it operates of itself without the aid of a legislative provision; but when the terms of the stipulation import a contract, and either of the parties engages to perform a particular act, the treaty addresses itself to the political, not the judicial department, and the legislature must execute the contract before it can become a rule of the court. 2 Pet. S. C. Rep. 814. Vide Story on the Constitut. Index, h.t.; Serg. Constit. Law, Index, h.t.; 4 Hall’s Law Journal, 461; 6 Wheat. 161: 3 Dall. 199; 1 Kent, Comm. 165, 284. 5. Treaties are divided into personal and real. The personal relate exclusively to the persons of the contracting parties, such as family alliances, and treaties guarantying the throne to a particular sovereign and his family. As they relate to the persons they expire of course on the death of the sovereign or the extinction of his family. Real treaties relate solely to the subject-matters of the convention, independently of the persons of the contracting parties, and continue to bind the state, although there may be changes in its constitution, or in the persons of its rulers. Vattel, Law of Nat. b. 2, c. 12, 183-197.

A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution And Laws Of The United States Of America And Of The Several States Of The American Union by: John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856
TREATY defined: A compact made between two or more independent nations with a view to the public welfare. Louis Wolf & Co. v. United States, Cust. & Pat.App., 107 F.2d 819, 827; United States v. Belmont, N.Y., 301 U.S. 324, 57 S.Ct. 758, 761, 81 L.Ed. 1134. An agreement, league, or contract between two or more nations or sovereigns, formally signed by commissioners properly authorized, and solemnly ratified by the several sovereigns or the supreme power of each state. Edye v. Robertson, 112 U.S. 580, 5 S.Ct. 247, 28 L.Ed. 798; Charlton v. Kelly, 229 U.S. 447, 33 S.Ct. 945, 954, 57 L.Ed. 1274, 46 L.R.A.,N.S., 397. A treaty is not only a law but also a contract between two nations and must, if possible, be so construed as to give full force and effect to all its parts. United States v. Reid, C.C.A.Or., 73 F.2d 153, 155. The term has a far more restricted meaning under U.S. Constitution than under international law. Weinberger v. Rossi, Dist.Col., 456 U.S. 25, 102 S.Ct. 1510, 1514, 71 L.Ed.2d 715. United States treaties may be made by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. Art. II, Sec. 2, U.S. Const. States may not enter into treaties (Art. I, Sec. 10, cl. 1), and, once made, shall be binding on the states as the supreme law of the land (Art. VI, cl. 2). See Supremacy clause; Treaty clause. Black’s Law Dictionary Sixth Edition (page 1602)
UNCITRAL – United Nations Convention On International Trade Law



Please read article here:

5 Comments on Two United States Constitutions – 1789 – 1871

  1. In layman’s terms, what does it mean legally? Do we have to identify or call this out, or is there no way around it?

  2. From: Nanya Elbey for Short Royal Appellation Thats why the legal term for Name Represents Corporation and not for Living Human Being a Appelation Sept Name id For Living human Being not Names for Corporations Nom-de-Guerre or Capitus Dominitus Maximus or Civiliter Mortuus person War Name represents Corporations that are dead in the eyes of law artificial person artificial nationalities are not real person like the term what they call people of Aboriginal Autochthonous Descent as The Term African America Represent a Colonized person as Real Estate Property Chattel Person under the 14th Amendment Artificial Person when a person call a person of African Descent Black that is not a proper none that is a adjective or a Description of property a real Estate representative of a commercial merchandise as a Thing of Commerce on your drivers license or your ssn no. all Caps represents a artificial being of commerce the strawman is not the real you it is a conduit go through of commerce for tool for extorting and extracting labor from the living human being and so is the birth Certificate also it is a dead document made up by the state

  3. Affidavit of Sovereign Rights
    Whereas, “We the People of the United States” hold our God-given unalienable sovereign rights to selfgovern
    by indigenous power endowed by our Creator and guaranteed by the ten Articles of the Bill of Rights, circa 1791, which
    reserved and preserved the sovereignty of the people. We the People in the Republic for the united States of America reaffirm and
    continue “The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,” July 4, 1776, and “The Constitution for the United
    States of America,” ratified with the Bill of Rights, circa 1791. Further, the Supreme Court affirmed the sovereignty of the people in
    1793 in Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 US 419 by Chief Justice John Jay stating, “At the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the
    people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects and have none to govern but
    themselves.” President Andrew Johnson likewise referenced this sovereignty in a proclamation on December 25, 1868, “and in the
    name of the sovereign People of the United States.” Therefore, as one of “We the People of the United States,” by these presents,
    I affirm, witness, and testify I am an American sovereign, known as a Citizen of the United States of America and of the
    free State in which I live, pursuant to our de jure Constitution, c.1791, Article I, Section 2, or Article IV, Section 2, in referencing a
    “Citizen of the United States” or “Citizens of each State.” I hold the sole, exclusive, and lawful meaning of Citizen to be a natural
    born Citizen or lawfully naturalized living man or women living on the organic geographical land mass within the territorial and
    jurisdictional borders of the Republic for the united States of America. These Citizens, from the free and independent states have
    joined together, irrespective of the geographical states in which they live, and are known as We the People of the United States of
    America, the Republic for the united States of America, and/or the Republic for/of the United States of America; and
    I affirm, witness, and testify I am not a citizen, federal citizen, civilian, resident, debtor, chattel, or subject of political
    venue or jurisdiction by cause of contract with incorporated powers of the District of Columbia, directly or indirectly. I hold no
    allegiance and/or fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, sovereign, country, or affiliate subject. I am not bound to any
    political district, agency, affiliate, or incorporated powers of any kind, willingly or unintentionally, which would waive lawful
    United States of America Citizenship status, responsibilities, duties, and rights enumerated and protected by our de jure Constitution.
    All such terms and conditions are inferior and only enforceable, binding, and valid to the extent that all are subject to the supremacy
    of the aforementioned Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and lawful amendments and general laws pursuant; and
    I affirm, witness, and testify my sole and exclusive political jurisdiction and law venue rest on the blessings of liberty and
    justice for all; the common law of God; the Holy Bible; sacred trust of self-governance; the Declaration of Independence, July 4,
    1776; the Constitution for the United States of America, of “the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand
    seven hundred and eighty seven,” and ratified with the Bill of Rights, circa 1791; and lawful amendments and general laws pursuant.
    In Witness this day I do hereby subscribe my name.

  4. wow totally taken out of context huh? I just found the original doc for the Treaty of Paris . “The Definitive Treaty of Peace between his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America.” In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity.

    It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third , by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America, to forget all past misunderstandings and differences that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore, and to establish such a beneficial and satisfactory intercourse , between the two countries upon the ground of reciprocal advantages and mutual convenience as may promote and secure to both perpetual peace and harmony; and having for this desirable end already laid the foundation of peace and reconciliation by the Provisional Articles signed at Paris on the 30th of November 1782 by the commissioners empowered on each part, which articles were agreed to be inserted in and constitute the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States, but which treaty was not to be concluded until terms of peace should be agreed upon between Great Britain and France and his Britannic Majesty should be ready to conclude such treaty accordingly; and the treaty between Great Britain and France having since been concluded, his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America, in order to carry into full effect the Provisional Articles above mentioned, according to the tenor thereof, have constituted and appointed, that is to say his Britannic Majesty on his part, David Hartley , Esqr., member of the Parliament of Great Britain, and the said United States on their part, John Adams , Esqr., late a commissioner of the United States of America at the court of Versailles, late delegate in Congress from the state of Massachusetts, and chief justice of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary of the said United States to their high mightinesses the States General of the United Netherlands; Benjamin Franklin , Esqr., late delegate in Congress from the state of Pennsylvania, president of the convention of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary from the United States of America at the court of Versailles; John Jay , Esqr., late president of Congress and chief justice of the state of New York, and minister plenipotentiary from the said United States at the court of Madrid; to be plenipotentiaries for the concluding and signing the present definitive treaty; who after having reciprocally communicated their respective full powers have agreed upon and confirmed the following articles.

  5. OK what is the bottom line in how to thwart the laws?
    I do not consent. I never gave informed consent either.
    Non Assumpsit maybe?
    Or Vi Coactus?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.