What Did They Get Right?
Reflecting on the last three years of terror, torment, and totalitarianism, a tweet from Justin Hart got us thinking.
He asked a simple thought-provoking question about COVID: “Did ‘they’ get a single thing right?”
We must admit we struggled to find a single thing ‘they’ got right, but here are some of Justin’s thoughts:
- Transmission of the disease – wrong
- Asymptomatic spread – wrong
- PCR testing – wrong
- Fatality rate – wrong
- Lockdowns – wrong
- Community triggers – wrong
- Business closures – wrong
- School closures – wrong
- Quarantining healthy people – wrong
- Impact on youth – wrong
- Hospital overload – wrong
- Plexiglass barriers – wrong
- Social distancing – wrong
- Outdoor spread – wrong
- Masks – wrong
- Variant impact – wrong
- Natural immunity – wrong
- Vaccine efficacy – wrong
- Vaccine injury – wrong
Anything, ‘Bueller’?
As Hart so eloquently and succinctly puts it: “To repeat. They. Got. EVERYTHING. Wrong!”
Which is interesting because as we were writing this post, the world’s richest man – with access to all the ‘dissent’-crushing communications – replied to a timely question…
It’s coming
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 23, 2023
At his ‘Rational Ground’ Substack, Hart lays out his views on what actually happened with COVID…
Every year humans endures a “flu season” – a period denoting the high-water mark of that year’s wave of respiratory viral pathogens.
Believe it or not we still have strains of the 1889 Russian flu, the 1918 Spanish flu, the 1957 Asian flu, the 1968 Hong Kong Flu, the 2009 H1N1 virus – all these various strains of nasty bugs rear their head every single year.
In late 2019, a new “novel” pathogen appeared on the scene – a bug from the “Coronavirus” family (“corona” describing the spike-like structure of the particles.)
The official title was SARS-CoV-2. SARS = “severe acute respiratory syndrome”; CoV-2 = “Coronavirus 2.” This particular virus can cause a disease called COVID-19 (“Coronavirus Disease 2019”). The disease is thought to have originated in China and found significant human-to-human transmission. It is thought to be “novel” because prior infections of other pathogens do not seem to creative anti-bodies to tackle this newfound disease within the human body.
Officials raised alarms about the potential mortality witnessed from COVID-19. Governments across the world scrambled to address and protect their populations from what quickly became a pandemic.
Efforts ranged from stringent to downright authoritarian. Results were mixed to say the least. In early 2022, it was thought that SARS-Cov-2 and COVID-19 would join the panoply of viruses and diseases we experience during the annual ebb and flow of life.
That’s the short sterile version of what transpired.
Here’s what actually happened:
- Global elites had ramped up significant efforts to reshape the world to address a host of inequalities and imagined boogeymen like climate change.
- These global elites were bolstered by a host of corrupt institutions which included the WHO (“World Health Organization”), big pharmaceutical companies, and world wealth and health players like Bill Gates.
- With the emergence of a new virus these groups pounced at the vulnerable moment to put their plans into action and retool the world with a host of proposals – this was known as The Great Reset. The Coronavirus response was just the first sortie in this plan.
- Governments across the world, under the threat of serious mortality (real or imagined), caved to the plan of action which utilized never-before imagined cram downs on individual rights, massive financial expenses, and enhanced authority overhauls to set the stage for a shift of power.
- Free speech, right to assembly, right to bodily autonomy, representative government all fell within months of the first COVID-19 cases announced in almost every country.
Read more here…
*********
(TLB) published this article from ZeroHedge as compiled and written by Tyler Durden
Header featured image (edited) credit: Long nose w/mask/orginal ZH post
Emphasis added by (TLB) editors
••••
••••
Stay tuned to …
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
With regard to the fraudulent, alleged SARS-Cov-2 “plandemic”, the people who are primarily bringing the most important truths to light are those researches who have been comprehensively studying one or more of the following: coronaviruses and/or coronavirus research articles from very early on; all of the existing coronavirus research patent documents and coronavirus research funding grant applications and awards; all of the alleged Covid-19 injection product related contracts between various entities; all of the changes and additions to laws related to exemption from liability for debilitation and/or death caused by these injection products; and all of the laws related to the manufacture and/or use of biochemical weapons.
These people are, in part, Professor Francis Boyle, Dr. David E. Martin, Dr. Judy A. Mikovits, Karen Kingston, Katherine Watt, and Dr. Sasha Latypova.
With regard to mainly the alleged SARS-Cov-2 spike protein and the mRNA injection products, these people have shown that these products are:
1) man-made bioweapons funded mainly initially by Fauci’s NIAID, with DARPA joining in the funding in 2005, when it recognized the bioweapon capabilities. Professor Boyle noted that in a peer reviewed 2015 Nature Medicine article, it can be seen that even the CCP has contributed to the funding.
2) the U.S. military, in cooperation with other countries, is apparently currently in full control of the research, production, and distribution. Pfizer and Moderna are paid billions of dollars for simply lending their corporate names to the products, while the U.S. military contracts with third-party manufacturers, some off-shore, to produce these bioweapon products.
A most important remaining issue is whether everyone involved in the development, production, and distribution of these bioweapons is exempt from liability. Apparently, the military, the manufacturers, and the government believe everyone has been made exempt from liability, via changes to U.S. laws and the appropriate wording of contracts. Karen Kingston and David Martin contend that, since these products are bioweapons, no one is exempt from liability.
This appears to be where we are at, waiting to see if some state AG has the guts to bring this to court.
I always recommend to people who aren’t aware of the above to first watch the following 9:16 minute discussion between Canadian constitutional attorney Rocco Galati, Dr. David E. Martin, Dr. Judy A. Mikovits, and Attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Dr. David Martin tells us this is not a vaccine but rather a medical device.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ApnVWjiDdPeD/
The second video I recommend is “Plandemic Indoctornation” at freedomplatform.tv/movie