Contrails Matter: Chemtrail Narratives + the Billion $$ Secret
by Raphaëlle O’Neil, TLB Contributing Author
Anybody who’s tried waking up his or her friends & family to the hiding-in-plane site truth of GeoEngineering knows how tricky it can be. Cognitive dissonance abounds and getting people to acknowledge what is right before their eyes can be an impossible and thankless task. But what if our approach could be refined? What if instead of being in the position of justifying our claims of “being sprayed by chemtrails”, we turned the tables around on those claiming “those are just harmless water vapor”, putting them in the position of defending themselves? “Just harmless water vapor”?? Oh, really?
First of all, according to the EPA & FAA Contrail Fact Sheet (1), contrails are not just water vapor, as they include –
“water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), small amounts of nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, sulfur gases, and soot and metal particles formed by the high-temperature combustion of jet fuel during flight.”
So they are not “just” water vapor, at all. But, the Fact Sheet continues…
“The combination of water vapor in aircraft engine exhaust and the low ambient temperatures that often exists at these high altitudes allows the formation of contrails. Contrails are composed primarily of water (in the form of ice crystals) and do not pose health risks to humans. They do affect the cloudiness of the Earth’s atmosphere, however, and therefore might affect atmospheric temperature and climate. The basic processes of contrail formation described in this fact sheet apply to both civil and military aircraft.”
“Persistent contrails are of interest to scientists because they increase the cloudiness of the atmosphere. The increase happens in two ways. First, persistent contrails are line-shaped clouds that would not have formed in the atmosphere without the passage of an aircraft. Secondly, persistent contrails often evolve and spread into extensive cirrus cloud cover that is indistinguishable from naturally occurring cloudiness (See Figure 3). At present, it is unknown how much of this more extensive cloudiness would have occurred without the passage of an aircraft. Not enough is known about how natural clouds form in the atmosphere to answer this question.”
So essentially they’re saying, they’re not chemtrails, they’re contrails, and they don’t matter, though they might alter the climate, but not enough is known to prove that at this time. And done in the very same paper that claims contrails are not chemtrails. If limited liability is the game, plausible deniability is how it is played! What about that “carbon dioxide (CO2), small amounts of nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, sulfur gases, and soot and metal particles” they reported on? “Small amounts” is surely a relative term when you multiply the amount by the myriad of overt and covert flights that go on day in and day out, year after year.
So, on a GOOD day, airplane exhaust is a highly polluting industry. I learned that years earlier from a pilot’s son when I first started looking into the chemtrail phenomena, but overlooked it. When I told him about “chemtrails”, the guy said, “Oh, you mean the pollution problem we’ve known about for years?”, to which I then replied, “No… I mean something more deliberate than pollution”. The part about the program being deliberate, is where many people get lost.
But what if I said, it doesn’t matter whether we can prove a contrail is a deliberate chemtrail or not- and not just because all contrails are chemtrails- but because, quite simply, contrails matter!
That water vapor is the most prominent greenhouse gas on the planet is a billion dollar secret (2). Google “IPCC + greenhouse gases” and watch what comes up on your image search. Loads of graphs showing CO2 as the largest slice of the greenhouse gas pie pops up, with methane a not-too-close second, but none of these graphs, show water vapor on there, yet, if you alter your search criteria by simply adding “water vapor” to the search bar containing “greenhouse gas + IPCC” , all of a sudden, the charts emerge showing that water vapor, and NOT CO2, is the most prominent GHG.
“A greenhouse gas, like carbon dioxide, it represents around 80 percent of total greenhouse gas mass in the atmosphere and 90 percent of greenhouse gas volume. Water vapor and clouds account for 66 to 85 percent of the greenhouse effect, compared to a range of 9 to 26 percent for CO2.” ~Yale 2008 (3)
Click on the Yale link above and you’ll be redirected to a page that will try to reassure you that water vapor is nothing to worry about, as it’s part of the CO2 feedback loop and may have a cooling effect. Speaking out of both sides of their “mouth”, they also admit that it can have a warming effect at times, as well.
“Furthermore, warmer temperatures tend to (but do not always) increase evaporation rates, leading to a higher concentration of atmospheric water vapor. This feedback acts in a number of different and at times contradictory ways.”
The Yale article continues, “While uncertainties in the magnitude of water vapor feedbacks are one of the key areas concerning climate change, none of this research casts any doubt on the role of carbon dioxide and other anthropogenic greenhouse gases as the initial forcings behind our current climate perturbation.”
Despite admitting to the uncertainty in knowing the full effect of water vapor to the checks and balances of the global warming/climate change scenario, they confidently blow it off as secondary to the CO2 problem. Perhaps this is all fine and dandy if you are just dealing with water vapor from natural hydrological sources, but when you are dealing with condensed water vapor in the form of anthropogenic clouds coming out of various industries, then you are leaving out a whole other realm of water vapor from your model, and this is the point that needs to be highlighted—
“Even small changes in the abundance or location of clouds could change the climate more than the anticipated changes caused by greenhouse gases, human-produced aerosols, or other factors associated with global change.” ~ NASA (4)
Albedo modification (5) plays a huge part in climate and is the single most prominent factor that could influence change in climate with only small amounts of change in abundance or location. The rest (6) of the official literature (7) acknowledges this fact, while at the same time, refusing to own it. Plausible deniability certainly is convenient!
In our next article, we’ll go into some more of the history of albedo modification and how it came into the scientific vernacular as a stated desire.
But we are seeing more than albedo modification. As unbelievable as this may sound, Weather Wars101 [Video] (8) and others have shown through radar captures that synchronized, massive water vapor releases fed into the “1,000 year flood” that occured in Louisiana and other severe weather events. Of course these anthropological hydro-logical events aren’t limited to just Louisiana.
The big disinformation in the anti-Chemtrail/GeoEngineering narrative is that contrails don’t matter because they are “just water vapor”. With countless communities being washed away each time bad weather rolls through, it’s time to set the record straight and demand accountability for and monitoring of anthropological clouds, be they deliberate or accidental.
Greater accountability will ultimately lead to greater scrutiny & hopefully greater responsibility, or full disclosure, if the programs are indeed deliberate and necessary. The continued use of lies and denials to advance these programs is no longer acceptable to a public undergoing a great awakening of consciousness.
About the author:
Raphaëlle O’Neil is a climate engineering awareness activist & educator, and author of the children’s chemtrail book “Funny Clouds: A Chemtrail Tale”, illustrated by Sean Gautreaux. [See video review below] She is also a massage therapist, who’s passion for liberty has made her a freedom fighter going back her whole life, but after surviving recent assaults on the environment after Katrina and the BP oil spill, she renewed her commitment to ringing the alarm on various pressing environmental issues.
Because no safeguards to a clean environment can be made without the right to freedom of speech, she was forced to defend herself against such tyranny by going up to bat for the constitution of the Unites States of America, which she did by being Press Chief for P.A.N.D.A (People Against the National Defense Authorization Act) until the birth of her child.
Podcast: Though she covers multiple issues on her podcast Beyond the Veil on her nolabutterfly youtube channel, ranging from free speech, mind control, and other shady government cover-ups, she is primarily focused on climate engineering and the way it is being used to advance the globalist agenda we see unfolding today.
She is currently working with others to change the chemtrail narrative into one that holds anthropological cloud makers responsible for the effects of their creations… regardless of the intent… driving the making of clouds in hopes of forcing greater scrutiny, integrity & accountability on the part of the public at large. She is thrilled to contribute to The Liberty Beacon!
Follow TLB on Twitter @thetlbproject
The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.
TLB has other above the fold articles, videos and stories available by clicking on “HOME” at the top of this post. Never miss a new post, sign up for E-Mail alerts at the bottom of the Home page and get a link dropped right to your in-box.
TheLibertyBeacon.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.