First Study on Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children Pulled from Web

Preface by Christopher Wyatt | TLB staff writer/documentary producer

Here are two great articles that explain how a study of unvaccinated children versus vaccinated kids has been censored from the public. I am all for such a study but I have concerns because no study will ever explain to the pro vaccine crowd the benefits of natural immunity, nor will a study explain why unvaccinated children simply look healthier than those who have been injected with vaccines. Vaccines deny the body natural immunity and they cause a multitude of illnesses! VACCINES ARE POISON!!! Most people reading this know this but I fear no amount of evidence  at this time will convince the masses that vaccines do way more harm than good. It is obvious to me that we have a lot of work to do if we are going to change the public opinion of vaccines. People have to see these studies and they have to know the serious nature of vaccine injury.

Vaccines cause harm 100% of the time and there is no real way to know just how a vaccine will impact a person. Now more than ever we need to educate others about vaccine injury and the benefits of natural immunity. When you poison any living creature it gets sick and it dies!!! Vaccine injury can be a slow painful death from autoimmune disorders, it can be mistaken for part of the normal aging process, or it can be sudden!!!  WHEN WILL THE PRO VACCINE INSANITY END??? It will come to an end when all anti vaxers / non vaxers are speaking up and out in the streets putting an end to it. It will end when anti vaxers / non vaxers embrace natural immunity for their families and are not afraid to talk about it when educating others about vaccines. It will end when all people harmed by vaccines speak up!!!

All of us have a duty to risk it all, end vaccine injury, and bring back health!!! This can not be done hiding behind a computer screen!!! We have to be out in the streets interacting with the world on a daily basis. We have to be at the vaccine clinics and talking to every man, woman, and child. We can do this but it won’t happen while playing on facebook!!! (CW)

First Study on Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Children Pulled from Web

By Christina Sarich

The results of the first ever study comparing the health of vaccinated children vs. unvaccinated children is out, and they are already causing controversy. For many – hundreds of thousands of families that have already been injured by vaccines – the results won’t be surprising, but to many others, the findings might be a little shocking. This is possibly why the scientific journal which originally published the results withdrew the study from publication.

The abstract of the study was published online in Frontiers in Public Health after being accepted November 2. The study compared children’s health via surveys of mothers who home-schooled their children aged 6-12 years. Nearly 40 percent of the children had never been vaccinated, so the control group was adequate to do a good comparison against children who had been vaccinated.

After heavy criticism from the public and scientific community due to the results of the study, though, it was retracted. Why? Those that were vaccinated were three times more likely to be diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism.

The abstract specifically stated,

“A total of 415 mothers provided data on 666 children, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability).”

The study further concluded,

“In this study based on mothers’ reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors. However, preterm birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

The initial backlash was significant. Public comments included, “this study is of poor design, though not impossible results. Study relies of self-report of moms, inducing bias,” and, “Another garbage vaccine study in Frontiers journal. Scientists, stop reviewing/publishing there.”

Science Blogs also quickly posted an article titled, “Antivaccinationists promote a bogus internet “survey.” Hilarity ensues as it’s retracted.

When the paper was pulled, the publishers were also accused of not following a proper retraction process. Though the journal isn’t the first to pull a vaccine paper amid public criticism — in February, Vaccine temporarily removed — then soon retracted — a paper linking the vaccine for Human papillomavirus to behavioral problems in mice; a modified version of the paper was later republished, the retraction is suspect considering how quickly the paper was pulled. When the publishers were asked why this happened, they simply responded that the paper was submitted for review, but had not been approved.

Researchers like Catherine J. Frompovich likely wouldn’t think the study is so ‘hilarious’ as Science Blogs attests. She writes of a doctor in the UK who believes vaccines are indeed tied to autism. Dr. Graham Downing, who is a Neuro-musculoskeletal and Functional Medicine consultant in the UK has found that the vaccination of pregnant women increases inflammation in their bodies and also increases the risk of releasing inflammatory markers in their fetuses/infants. Such releases include phenotypes [the set of observable characteristics of an individual resulting from the interaction of its genotype with the environment.]

Downing also contends that the increased inflammation in cells caused by vaccines, also elevate in the fetal brain where cytokines release glutamates. The prefrontal lobes and the limbic system, which involves human emotions, are affected in fetuses from pregnancy vaccines administered to moms-to-be. So, not only are children outside the womb affected, but the neurological/immunological decline starts while they are still in the womb.

Downing also attests that vaccines are tied to the artificial intelligence rollout goals of the elite. As Frompovich writes,

“Dr. Downing says there are five-year and fifteen year goals for AI. The fifteen-year goal is to have AI run everything, including humans! You have to listen to his comments about that aspect—one word: “frightening!” To ‘authentic’ his remarks, Doctor cited a report issued by the White House, “A Federal Vision for Future Computing: A Nanotechnology-inspired Grand Challenge.”

Here’s what that 15-page report is about:

Create a new type of computer that can proactively interpret and learn from data, solve unfamiliar problems using what it has learned, and operate with the energy efficiency of the human brain. [3]

[Basically, it’s an artificial brain to replace the human brain. Also, they want to create a new soul for humans, too!]”

So, why are vaccine promoters so quick to dismiss, or make a drivel of a study based on mothers’ health reports of their children? Bias or no bias – it’s hard to dismiss a 300 percent increase in autism and neurological damage rates – but those reasons are left to your imagination.

SOURCE

 

Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Children 2016 Health Study Pulled From Publication

By Catherine J Frompovich

28842016

 

The just-ended presidential election cycle in the USA has something very much in common with vaccine ‘science’, or so it seems: Both produce results that are questioned, contentious and even manipulated with varying degrees of culpability.  Strong words!  Maybe, but factual to the point of proof as in the scientific journal article that was “unpublished” after vaccine acolytes raised all sorts of hell about it and the study’s results proving that “Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability).

In the Abstract’s Conclusion, it was noted that In this study based on mothers’ reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the unvaccinated.  Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors.  However, preterm birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on children’s health.”

According to Baxter Dmitry at IWB (Investment Watch Blog) [1], the study was “unpublished” at Frontiers In Public Health, “but a cached version available on internet archives has also been removed, suggesting there is a serious campaign to stop members of the public from viewing the study. However a screenshot of the abstract was saved before it was scrubbed from the internet,” and which I have inserted below thanks to Baxter Dmitry.

Question: Does anything sound familiar regarding control mechanisms, especially when things don’t go the way controlling interests want them to go?

Answer: Either pull the article a la Dr Andrew Wakefield notoriety or demand vote recounts all the way up to a state’s Supreme Court!

However, there’s manipulation by the vaccine industry and its ‘press corps’ extolling totally unscientific and fraudulent reports (as confirmed by various Big Pharma [4] and CDC [5] whistleblowers) published everywhere with great fanfare, even when many of those vaccines are the ‘coincidences’ that cause today’s horrendous neurodevelopmental disorders not seen in the medical literature until the onset [late 1980s forward] of mandated vaccinations, some starting immediately after birth!

Personally, I find it extremely interesting that scientific journals obviously kowtow to skewed pro-vaccine science radical acolytes, especially those who promote apparently fraudulent studies such as Frank DeStefano, William Thompson and Coleen Boyle—U.S. CDC employees and bureaucrats, while Congress boldly looks the other way!

Generally, I think the vaccine industry and Big Pharma, in particular, owe Coleen Boyle, PhD, a tremendous debt of gratitude because she apparently perfected and became the ‘Mother of Obfuscation’ regarding the manipulation of research data to produce statistical results vested-interests want and need for published scientific studies.  Her research ‘magic and fingerprints’ apparently can be found in the Vietnam Agent Orange and several vaccine studies, especially the famous Danish MMR vaccine—no-Autism-link study!

Boyle’s ‘research’ work on disassociating Agent Orange with Vietnam War veterans’ health problems obviously gained her not only the respect of the pharmaceutical industry but a unique status and position she obviously enjoys within CDC as their ‘point person’ before Congress.

Furthermore, Boyle apparently played a ‘guiding tutorial role’ along with Diana Schendel (Thorsen’s CDC girlfriend) in the Poul Thorsen Danish MMR vaccine study the CDC always trots out as proof that the MMR vaccine does not cause Autism based upon Danish health data that were massaged around to get the results the CDC obviously was looking for, but also was scammed out of more than $2 million by indicted and “criminal-at-large-in-Denmark” Poul Thorsen!

If any paper should be retracted, vilified and removed from publication on the CDC’s website and in the New England Journal of Medicine, it should be the Poul Thorsen Danish MMR vaccine study [2, 3] co-authored with Diana Schendel, which you can read here https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12421889 that states, “This study provides strong evidence against the hypothesis that MMR vaccination causes autism.”

N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 7;347(19):1477-82.

A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism.

Madsen KM1, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, Schendel D, Wohlfahrt J, Thorsen P, Olsen J, Melbye M

The double-standards, which ‘guide’ and prevail regarding vested-interest-science and independent-research-science studies publication, retractions and discussions about vaccines, must be addressed if there is to be any hope of ever ending the ever-growing, frightening neurodevelopmental disorders* children have been contracting overwhelmingly [6] ever since vaccines took off  [7] like greased lightning at the behest of the CDC/FDA, the totally-misinformed-and-proselytized medical professions and their financially-generous ‘muse’, Big pHARMa.

[1] http://investmentwatchblog.com/study-proving-vaccines-cause-autism-banned-from-internet/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Investmentwatch+%28InvestmentWatchBlog%29

[2] http://www.robertfkennedyjr.com/articles/forbes.082215.html

[3] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr/central-figure-in-cdc-vac_b_494303.html

[4] http://philadelphia.legalexaminer.com/fda-prescription-drugs/massive-fraud-in-merck-mmr-vaccine-testing/

[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdCU2DfMBpU

[6] https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/developmentaldisabilities/features/birthdefects-dd-keyfindings.html

[7] http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html

[8] https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/ace3_neurodevelopmental.pdf

SOURCE

 

*********

Visit Christopher Wyatt on both his FB page and personal blog

Membership meme 3
Click on the link to find out about our great (WOW) TLB Project Membership package and benefits.

 

The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions.

TLB has other above the fold articles, videos and stories available by clicking on “HOME” at the top of this post. Never miss a new post, sign up for E-Mail alerts at the bottom of the Home page and get a link dropped right to your in-box.

TheLibertyBeacon.com contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: