Strong words they are. Something very peculiar that I must report. I have traveled all over this great country of ours (the USA) attempting to find someone who could tell me anything positive about Monsanto. I’m not the only one. If I did find someone, I had only later come to find out that they were indirectly on the Monsanto payroll.
Despite this voluntary and objective conviction, all the reporting and following of Monsanto leads me to do a reality check once a year. The writing below was produced in the 1990′s and it’s strange to read. Strange because the predictions in the writing of what’s to come have indeed happened.
I ask myself, “has Monsanto really committed any crimes?”
For example, so what if they’re methods for food production, among other things, result in the poisoning of human beings over their life span – you still get to live right?
I mean, that’s what petroleum makers do too right? We drive vehicles powered by fossil fuel, it produces carbon dioxide and we breath that air. Monsanto is no worse right?
If you see the logic here and can step away from that thinking for a moment, you may believe that you have lost your mind. If so you are indeed correct… you have lost your mind.
To get us back on track, here is a list of Monsanto’s crimes (including factual references.) I never publish anything about anyone that is not factual – that would be slander.
Monsanto’s Corporate Crimes
Monsanto has an impressive history of committing corporate crime . Highlights of Monsanto crimes include:
BST or rBGH marketed by Monsanto as Posilac, is a genetically engineered hormone designed to make cows produce more milk. Large amounts of research indicate that BST use has serious implications for the health and welfare of dairy cattle, including making cows more prone to mastitis and sores . Because of evidence that BST milk may cause breast cancer, colon cancer and prostate cancer in humans, it is banned in Europe. Monsanto is trying to overturn the ban .
Contaminating our food with GM crops
As the market leaders in GM crops it is Monsanto who have been largely responsible for contaminating the global food chain with GM crops. The long term health effects of eating GM crops are as yet unknown. (fast forward to today – we now have an idea of the size and scope of what we DO NOT know. It’s a mountain of unknowns.)
Contaminating our environment with GM crops
The long term effects of Monsanto’s GM crops on the environment are as yet unknown. (fast forward to today – the main ingredient in Roundup, “Glyphosate” has been banned in Brazil – and other countries will soon follow) In areas where RoundUp Ready crops are being grown commercially, herbicide tolerance is being spread to neighboring crops and wild plants by cross pollination. Rather than reducing the amount of chemicals used in farming RoundUp Ready crops are locking farmers into a chemical dependent farming system . Several scientific studies have suggested that the Bt technology utilized by Monsanto in their Bollgard, YieldGard and NewLeaf insect resistant crops may kill ‘non-pest’ insects such as the Monarch butterfly .
Having encountered increasing opposition to GM technology in the developed global north, Monsanto have put more energy into pushing their products in the developing global south. For example; the attempt by Monsanto/Mahyco to rush their Bt insect resistant cotton through the Indian government’s regulatory process and on to the market. The decision on allowing commercial growing of Bt cotton was postponed for a year in the face massive opposition from Indian farmers and NGOs all over the world .
Monsanto holds a patent for ‘terminator’ technology. Terminator technology involves the genetically engineering of plants to produce sterile seeds thus forcing farmers to buy new seed every year, rather than saving their own seed from year to year. Monsanto has said it will not use this technology but still holds the patents and may use it in future . This is too close to “playing god” we think.
Monsanto despises anyone who knowingly or not, undermines their strategic goals with the world’s food supply. Where Monsanto’s Genetically Modified (GM) crops are being grown commercially, Monsanto has paid a small crowd of private investigators to check whether farmers are growing their GM crops without permission. Monsanto has successfully sued a Canadian farmer named Percy Schmeiser for supposedly planting Canola without a license agreement.
Percy claimed that he has never planted GM crops on his land and that any GM crops on his land are a result of cross pollination from GM crops grown on neighboring farms. He launched a counter suit against Monsanto . In 1997 2 TV journalists Steve Wilson and Jane Akre who had been making a documentary on the dangers of Monsanto’s BST were fired by their employers Fox TV.
Fox TV had come under pressure from Monsanto to change the content of the documentary, when Wilson and Akre refused to be muzzled they were sacked .
In 1998 Monsanto took out a wide ranging SLAPP (Stategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) against activists from Genetix Snowball. At the time Genetix Snowball were engaged in a campaign of accountable, non-violent direct action against GM crops. The injunction was designed to intimidate members of the public into not taking direct action against Monsanto’s UK GM field trials .
In 1998 the environmental journal the Ecologist was due to publish a special edition attacking Monsanto. However, the Ecologist’s printers – Penwells of Saltash, Cornwall, destroyed the 14,000 print run without notice fearing liable action from Monsanto .
Climate Change Co-option
Monsanto detected the potential for new markets for their GM products within the mechanisms of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol on climate change . Since 1998 Monsanto has been one of the principle corporations attempting to hijack the UN climate change negotiations for its own ends. Monsanto claims that its products offer high-tech solutions in the battle to reduce CO2 emissions. Monsanto hopes to gain carbon credits in two ways.
1. Monsanto claims that wide spread use of RoundUp Ready crops will reduce the need for plowing thus; keeping large quantities of CO2 locked in the soil.
2. Monsanto hopes to be a major provider of GM trees for forestry ‘carbon sinks’ (large areas of forests planted to soak up CO2 emissions). Monsanto are close to commercializing RoundUp Ready trees and are rumored to be developing carbon absorbing trees and plants.