How the High ‘Covid’ Death Rate in Care Homes Was Created on Purpose [VIDEO]

ER Editor: We made a few notes of our own below of this most interesting interview between James Corbett and Canadian medical journalist, Rosemary Frei, who investigated specific care home conditions in Ontario, Canada. From reporting in France and the UK, one can easily see how policies were developed very rapidly to leave the elderly in these homes, ensuring that they wouldn’t be sent to hospital for necessary treatment related to covid infection. The UK has been issuing Do Not Resuscitate notices automatically on such people, and relatives were conveniently kept away from their family members. Further, these people were never receiving the regular medical care they would need during the lockdown period. And if care home staff were themselves ill or afraid to come into work, then these people would be truly abandoned.

We are entirely of the opinion that the policies uniquely put in place for this virus ‘event’ would allow the virus to cull this part of the population. And as James Corbett notes below, the policies used to elevate the death rate would serve to weaponize fear of the virus on the rest of us, serving the Big Pharma agenda.

It is linked to below in the show notes below the video, but we’re highlighting Rosemary Frei’s accompanying article published through Off-Guardian, titled Were conditions for high death rates at Care Homes created on purpose?


On the conditions in care homes, there are three relevant aspects:

  1. A broad definition of ‘covid’: the sniffles deem you have covid in the UK; in Ontario, Canada, it’s sniffles and a cough. Only one person needs to have this symptom and the whole care home would be assumed to have covid. And a person who dies is deemed to have covid automatically. What we need to see is a narrowing of the definition.
  2. New hospital care rationing guidelines: From the middle of March, there were new triaging guidelines created so that care should be rationed in specific ways. The NIC in the UK set guidelines, as well as the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM). Each one said the main criteria for getting care, or not getting it, is age. Different parameters used to be employed, but never age. So concerning covid, priority was put on younger people for getting care. April 17, federal Canadian guidelines also said that older people should not be sent to hospital. This is a red flag.
  3. New rules around death certificates and removal of bodies: how are deaths registered in Ontario? New rules were set on April 8th by Dr. Dirk Huyer, Chief Medical Examiner for Ontario: if somebody dies in hospital or a longterm care home, the body is removed within either an hour or 3 hours. This was premised on a high death rate that never materialized. Then the death certificates are done by other people, in this case the office of the Chief Medical Officer of Ontario, not by people physically close to the deceased. Then bodies are buried or cremated almost right away. So the bodies are quickly whisked away from the actual context of death, and there is no opportunity for a post mortem.

Dr. Huyer gave an affadavit 2 years ago to an enquiry surrounding deaths in Western Ontario due to a nurse who was a serial murderer; she was only discovered because she had confessed. Frei interviewed Huyer on April 20th, 2020: in April, he said it didn’t matter if a dead body is moved in order for it to be examined, yet he had said at the time of the enquiry two years earlier that it was important that the body should be looked at in situ. Thus he completely changed the rules. Now Huyer is in charge of the expansion of testing in Ontario.

Rationing of care: A March 23 paper in the NEJM talked about giving care to those who have more of a chance of survival, with a longer life expectancy following treatment. This completely changes the rules – that older people should now get a lower ranking in triage. Age has never been included in care guidelines but suddenly it’s included. The Canadian Medical Association adopted this same criterion for the rationing of care as recommended by the NEJM.  The lead author of the NEJM paper is the brother of Rahm Emmanuel, bioethicist Ezekiel Emmanuel of the Centre for American Progress.

The real question here is WHY this is being done. There is clearly an agenda because it’s not only happening in Ontario. It’s been so broadly applied. Frei: it saves the government money. Government is not an ethical body, and old people are expensive. The elderly don’t contribute much to the tax base.

Corbett: But what about Big Pharma? All this increases the death toll, which in turn increases fear in the population and makes people want the vaccine. A sense of crisis makes the public line up for that shot.

Frei and Amory Devereux did a recent piece on Koch’s Postulates, which identifies a particular disease based on a particular cause. This gold-standard method to establish the existence of a new disease has never been done for covid-19. So when we talk about covid, what are we really talking about? See Scientists Have Utterly Failed to Prove that the Coronavirus Fulfills Koch’s Postulates.  This absence of definition in acceptable medical, scientific and legal terms is part of the basis of a legal case being brought against the UK government by lawyer Robin Tilbrook. See The UK Coronavirus Act 2020 is Null and Void!


Interview 1555 – Rosemary Frei on How the High Death Rate in Care Homes Was Created on Purpose


Rosemary Frei has an M.Sc in molecular biology from a faculty of medicine and was a freelance medical journalist for 22 years. She is now an independent journalist in Canada. In her recent article, “Were conditions for high death rates at Care Homes created on purpose?” she examines how all of the rules and guidelines pertaining to elderly care, death certification and treatment of bodies in Ontario have been changed during the course of this “crisis” in order to increase the numbers reported “dying of COVID.” We discuss the reasons behind these changes and what they tell us about the real nature of this pandemic panic.

Watch this video on BitChute / LBRY / / YouTube or Download the mp4


Were conditions for high death rates at Care Homes created on purpose?

Affidavit of Dr. Huyer

The Wettlaufer Inquiry report with its recommendations

New rules for handling death certification and treatment of bodies (Ontario)

Rosie DiManno: Canada has been spared the horror of temporary morgues, but pandemic expediency comes with a cost

Bioethics and Eugenics: The Ugly Truth

Citizens Address the Toronto Board of Health on Vaccines

Scientists Have Utterly Failed to Prove that the Coronavirus Fulfills Koch’s Postulates

Rosemary Frei’s other articles

Rosemary Frei’s Twitter


Original article

Published to The Liberty Beacon from


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

1 Comment on How the High ‘Covid’ Death Rate in Care Homes Was Created on Purpose [VIDEO]

  1. You are 100% right, there is an Agenda, in fact more than one. A Globalist political agenda and an overpopulation Agenda which is being portrayed as Climate Change. The aim to reduce population by a third.
    Let me explain how I have reached this conclusion.
    Who is behind it and why are we being globally mislead now?

    The directives being acted upon by governments come from the World Health Organization (WHO).
    The WHO is an agency of the United Nations, ostensibly responsible for international public health.
    Others controlling the corona virus scare are national health agencies, most notably the U.S. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the UK’s National Health Service (NHS).

    The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention website contains “recommendations” from Event 201 (a practice Pandemic emergency).

    It is clear from their exercises in Pandemic response that it REQUIRES the media, public health authorities, social media companies, faith leaders etc to get behind the official line, everything else is deemed to be fake news and will be ACTIVELY SUPPRESSED.

    That’s why it’s so difficult now to challenge the governments actions despite their own Chief Medical Advisors contradicting the potency of the virus.
    Not only is there no freedom of the press, we are being actively manipulated by the press and social media!

    Another worrying aspect is the role China is playing in this. On the UN website it states that UN China has shifted from traditional donor to a PARTNER! “Assisting the Government of China in its global engagement…

    Given this Corona virus outbreak (and the fear generated by it) appears to have started in China it’s significant and troubling that the UN’s own agency, the WHO, (Partner of China) is controlling the Corona virus response!

    The level of collusion between the UN, WHO and China is clear and chilling.

    Cast our minds back to 21st Oct 2017 when the person now leading the WHO’s response to this “Pandemic” and turning our world upside down, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, thought in his wisdom to appoint Robert Mugabe as a UN goodwill ambassador. Yes that’s right, goodwill ambassador!!

    Human Rights Watch criticised Dr Tedros during his campaign for WHO Director-General, because he was part of what they said was an authoritarian regime in Ethiopia that persecuted members of the opposition and journalists.

    Given his record It’s not surprising Dr Tedros fits in well with the WHO’s new PARTNER, China. And we are letting the WHO control our handling of this fake “Pandemic”….

    The acceptance of the current agenda by world leaders has been gained through their commitment to UN Agenda 2030. Agenda 2030 is full of wonderful ideals but is worthy of being listed as the worlds biggest Trojan Horse.

    This agenda ties 193 countries to the recommendations of the UN. Individual national governments are not wholly free to make their own decisions especially when the “Global Emergency” card is pulled.

    Why is this happening now?

    Prior to this “Pandemic” we saw Extinction Rebellion protests that took place without any serious challenge by the police or government. In fact the police were often seen to be joining in.

    Extinction Rebellion did have a roll to play in preparing our mindset for what is to come.

    For many years scientists have been warning us about population growth.
    More lately it has been presented to us as climate change…… (Yes, I believe the climate is changing, however I believe climate change is a natural condition the effects of which have been augmented by environmental destruction through human activity).

    A warning about overpopulation came in a study carried out by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1972. The study explored the limits to growth using system dynamics theory and a computer model called “World3.
    It was commissioned by the Club of Rome. This is significant, the Club of Rome consists of current and former heads of state, UN bureaucrats, high-level politicians, government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe. Coincidently the same people and organisations controlling and benefiting from the response to this “Pandemic”.

    In 1972 the study showed that world population was comfortably within it’s limits and able to accommodate more growth. However….
    The same was not true when it was updated thirty years later.

    “The salient message from the LtG modelling was that continued growth in the global economy would lead to planetary limits being exceeded sometime in the 21st century, most likely resulting in the collapse of the population and economic system.”

    It begs the question that since the UN, business leaders and politicians etc (The Club of Rome) knew of these limits since 1972 and obviously suspected we were close to our limits long before then, why didn’t they make policies that would address it earlier instead of pushing and pushing for more growth?

    Let’s take a moment to look at population growth.

    Between 1900 and 2000 world population grew from 1.5 Billion to 6.1 Billion.
    Since 2000 it has grown to approx 7.76 billion, that’s a 27% increase in 20 years!!

    World population was anticipated to grow to around 10 Billion by 2050, that’s a 60% increase since the turn of this century. Clearly that rate of growth is not sustainable.

    Since industrial growth drives population growth, the logic seems to be that the reverse must be the solution. This “virus” appears to me to be the vehicle being used to deliberately crash the worlds economies and in turn reduce population.
    But don’t worry, crashing the economies won’t affect the seriously wealthy and powerful. In fact it transfers more power and wealth to them, (The Club of Rome)… The poor however will experience this in a much different way, no jobs and as government financial support dwindles, no money to buy food. Food prices will rise and as inflation sets in the poor will become more desperate. Desperate actions will be met with brutal force..
    Lets look at the measures already being thrust upon us, clearly not because of the virus:
    · Contact tracing amounts to nothing more than State surveillance.
    · The wearing of face masks is the dehumanisation of the population.
    · Social distancing makes us wary of others, turning everyone into a potential enemy. Whereas the opposite is true. Contact with other human beings challenges our immune systems, that’s how acquired immunity has worked for millions of years. This will in the long-term undermine our immune systems.
    · Lockdown is house arrest and for some solitary confinement. It breaks down our social, family and religious connections and is detrimental to our mental health.
    · Immunity passports are a way of introducing compulsory Bio-metric Identity Cards.
    · New normal is a Global Totalitarian Dictatorship.

    We are being conditioned to accept “Immunity passports” in the hope a vaccine can be found for this Corona virus. Despite the UK Chief Medical officer, Chris Whitty, saying about it’s potential danger….. “Most people will survive it”.

    We need to bear in mind the only disease in humans that we’ve ever eradicated is smallpox. (We’ve eliminated polio from many areas of the world and the only cases that are around are vaccine-related cases).

    A vaccine may never be found for this Corona virus (Sars-Cov 2) but what will be put in place are the control measures above.

    The measures being promoted and legislated for now have nothing to do with looking after the interests of society, they are to control a planned reduction in the population and control the remaining population.

    Back to the Club of Rome.
    A paper was published in May 2019 written by David Spratt and Ian Dunlop entitled. “Existential climate-related security risk: A scenario approach”…..
    David Spratt is a Research Director for Breakthrough National Centre for Climate Restoration, Melbourne and co-author of Climate Code Red: The case for emergency action.
    Ian Dunlop is a member of the Club of Rome. Formerly an international oil, gas and coal industry executive. Chairman of the Australian Coal Association. Chief executive of the Australian Institute of Company Directors, and chair of the Australian Greenhouse Office Experts Group on Emissions Trading 1998-2000.
    In his forword to the paper Admiral Chris Barrie, AC RAN Retied says:
    ”A doomsday future is not inevitable! But without immediate drastic action our prospects are poor. We must act collectively. We need strong, determined leadership in government, in business and in our communities to ensure a sustainable future for human kind. In particular, our intelligence and security services have a vital role to play, and a fiduciary responsibility, in accepting this existential climate threat, and the need for a fundamentally different approach to its risk management, as central to their considerations and their advice to government. The implications far outweigh conventional geopolitical threats.”
    “We need a social tipping point that flips our thinking before we reach a tipping point in the climate system.”

    This “Tipping point” I believe has been engineered by this phantom “Pandemic”.

    The document goes on to say:
    “To reduce or avoid such risks and to sustain human civilisation, it is essential to build a zero-emissions industrial system very quickly. This requires the global mobilisation of resources on an emergency basis, akin to a WARTIME level of response.”

    This is where we find ourselves now, The Club of Rome are on a warlike footing and we are not allowed to know the truth.
    We are their problem and they are dealing with us rather than giving us a choice to be part of the solution.

    What is happening now is a transfer of power to the New World Order, Western culture is being undermined and the fragile Western powers are likely to collapse. The surviving populace will be micromanaged.
    There is a blueprint of the type of global society we will end up with is already up and running in China.

    Is this what we really want? The freedoms we lose now we may never get back….

    We have seen this week, the Public outrage deliberately being whipped up on social media about Black Lives Matter. The more violent the demonstrations the more we legitimise the rights being taken away from us. Although those woke people think they are taking a very worthy stance, the reality is they are being manipulated into dismantling the symbols of hundreds of years of Western culture prior to its demise.
    If people were really outraged about slavery they would stop buying cheap imports made by slave labour now.
    We cannot help those exploited in the past and we should not forget them, but we can help the ones being exploited now. I wonder how many of the demonstrators are wearing clothes made by slave labour and still turn a blind eye and choose to buy them. They should be aware, many of those that survive this cull will become tomorrows slaves, their lives controlled in every detail.

    I don’t use the word cull lightly, already in this fake pandemic, callously those in care homes have been thrown to the wolves, millions of jobs have been destroyed, hospital treatments have been suspended and dental treatment denied. The fallout will hit the fan this winter. Take care.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.