Pro-Vaccine Immunologist Admits the Shocking Truth About Vaccines

Baby vaccinations 1

By: Michael Gaeta

For several years, until April of this year, I had been lecturing nationally to health professionals about the great vaccine hoax. Attending one such seminar was a board member of an association of health professionals, who invited me to speak on this subject at their national conference. I did, and had 90 minutes to present the most salient points from my 7-hour seminar. It caused quite a stir, and several clinicians thanked me for having the courage to speak the truth about this controversial subject.

Later that day, I sat on a panel of four experts to answer questions from conference attendees. Many of the questions were directed at the PhD immunologist on the panel, asking if the statements I had made in the morning presentation were true. To my surprise, the immunologist confirmed every assertion I had made.

The first was that it is pointless to administer drugs intended to stimulate antibody production to babies who are too young to produce antibodies. Infants in their first year mostly depend on generalized, non-specific immunity, including (hopefully) immunoglobulins from breast milk, to protect their young bodies from infection. They do not produce antibodies of their own until about age one. Despite this basic fact, the medical establishment insists administering a total of 19 shots, containing 24 vaccines, to infants on the 2, 4 and 6 month pediatric visits (Source: Somehow, the basic facts of human physiology and development do not apply to vaccines.

You can listen to an audio file of an exchange between an attendee and the immunologist about this question.

Play ButtonShe declined to be identified in my presentations, including this post, perhaps because she knows that anyone who speaks the truth about vaccines is savaged by the medical establishment and their compliant lapdogs in the mainstream media. It is professional suicide for anyone in conventional medicine to question the unquestionable (yet unproven) assumptions about vaccines: that they are effective, safe and necessary. I have stopped lecturing publicly on this subject for the same reason, because the attacks in recent years have become particularly vicious; and because my main message in my teachings is about personal responsibility, innate wholeness and opening to the largeness of who we are, not just vaccines.

Here’s the transcript of this shocking exchange:

Q. So the science seems fairly clear that for the first year of life, probably, that the immunization is not stimulating the kind of response we expect it to stimulate.

A. True.

Q. So what’s the rationale for continuing to do that if it’s not doing what it’s supposed to be [doing]?

A. The vaccines are given at pediatric wellness visits, and the idea is that you are training the parent to bring their child in at all the pediatric wellness visits, and that it’s only the year visit that actually is truly important. But that for most parents you are not going to get them to bring their kid in if they don’t come in at two months, four months, and six months. And so it’s actually more of a training thing.

It’s interesting, I was on the phone with [?] county public health last week, with one of their vaccine nurses. She was like, ‘Oh, you’re talking about vaccines? Make sure you tell them they have to do that year shot because the first three [the 2, 4 and 6 month shots] don’t work.’ I was like, ‘Yeah, I know.’ [laughter].

Now, the person speaking here is not some kid with a blog. This is an impeccably-credentialed, pro-vaccine PhD immunologist. She knows more about the detailed intracies of human immunology than I ever will. I have great respect for her, and her decades of dedicated work in this field. And I was so glad I was sitting right next to her as she confirmed what I and others have been saying for years.

Though I am not lecturing anymore publicly on the vaccine scam, I have a recording of the seminar available, with slides, notes, articles, etc., if you are interested in more on this subject.

Let’s muster the courage to question the Unquestionable Vaccine Assumptions, and ask, “Are they effective? Are they safe? Are they necessary?” The best, most rigorous science we have says “No,” or, at least, “We don’t know,” to all three questions. And clear, independent thinking about it generally concludes that vaccines are about profit, not health. I’ve had a natural family health practice for 21 years, and have never told a parent not to vaccinate their kids. That’s a personal decision. Bottom line: ask the tough questions, find your own answers, and decide for yourself. Our future is at stake.

Part Two:

This next excerpt, from the same vaccine panel of experts I participated in, confirms that the 24 recommended vaccines given in the first year of life can have no possible benefit, as infants cannot produce antibodies until about age one. I had made this statement in my morning presentation. At the panel Q & A that afternoon, a doctor came to the microphone to ask this highly-respected immunologist if what I had said was true. Here is the transcript and audio clip of this brief but remarkable exchange:

Play ButtonImmunologist: “So, in terms of the vaccines that are given at two months, four months and six months, right…”

Participant: “…there’s no protection.”

Immunologist: “There’s no protection from those vaccines. No. I’m sorry I missed the earlier talk, but there’s no real protection from the two months, four months and six months.”

According to the FDA/CDC Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), “More than 10 million vaccines per year are given to children less than 1 year old, usually between 2 and 6 months of age.” 10 million injected drugs per year, with no chance of providing any benefit. One can only wonder how the profit motive (greed) drives such science-free policy. If you would like to learn more about this issue, you may wish to obtain the complete seminar on this issue, which includes a fine presentation by vaccine rights attorney Alan Phillips, author of  The Authoritative Guide to Vaccine Legal Exemptions.  You can also listen to the many radio shows I have done on this greatest of medical myths, and subscribe to future podcasts.

The next logical question is whether vaccines have demonstrable benefit at age one and beyond. Perhaps we will explore this in a later post (unless too few of us oppose freedom-robbing internet censorship laws like SOPA, PIPA and ACTA, which could replace Net Neutrality with Net Censorship).

Parents, get informed, and not only by the medical establishment. Visit intelligent websites like  Then make a careful decision, one of the most important of your child’s life. Our future is at stake.


TLB recommends you visit Gaeta Communications for more pertinent articles and information.

See featured article here.

1 Comment on Pro-Vaccine Immunologist Admits the Shocking Truth About Vaccines

  1. The 2, 4 and 6 month DTaP vaccines definitely produce IgE antibodies. The fourth and fifth dose of DtaP can produce extensive limb swelling as a result. So the 2, 4 and 6 month shots have an effect – desirable or otherwise …

    Extensive swelling after booster doses of acellular pertussis-tetanus-diphtheria vaccines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.