Intro by Steve Cook
I am happy to relay to our readers this important message from Dr Tess Lawrie of the World Council for Health (WCH).
If it helps expose and defeat the globalist effort to hijack our governance via its front group the WHO, then it is worthy of any assistance can give it. Please take a close look at what Dr Lawrie has to say.
It is our view, by the way, that:
An elected government of honest, rational representatives of The People is perfectly capable of a sane evaluation of and response to an alleged epidemic – and that includes the ability to take (and evaluate) expert advice where needed.
The surrender of the sovereignty of an elected government and rendering it subservient to an unelected body and not The People for any reason whatsoever is not necessary, driven by ulterior motives and, when aided and abetted by our own politicians or bureaucrats, is a act of treason which shall see those responsible tried and, if found guilty, punished according to the law.
Enjoy the article, which came to me in the form of an email from Dr Lawrie.
Strategies to Counter the WHO Power Grab – Fact Finding Expert Hearing
Please do save the date – 26th March 2024 – for this critical hearing on the WHO performance, the plan to expand its power, and what we can do about it!
Beneath the WHO’s noble mandate lies a history marred by controversies, failures, mismanagement, and corruption.
WORLD COUNCIL FOR HEALTH
As the world grapples with the aftermath of the Covid-19 crisis and is being propagandised on ‘Disease X’ to drive centralised monopoly, it is imperative to scrutinize disturbing developments at the World Health Organization (WHO) and to mobilise effective strategies to counter their power grab and re-establish democratic country governance.
The WHO, seen by some as a leading international health agency, shoulders immense responsibility in safeguarding global public health. However, beneath its noble mandate, lies a history marred by controversies, failures, mismanagement, and corruption. From the tobacco scandal, to accusations of nuclear cover-ups, and the H1N1 false pandemic drug sales campaign; the WHO’s integrity faces scrutiny, rightfully raising challenging questions about its effectiveness and credibility. The WHO also performed dismally over the Covid-19 chapter. Thus the WHO’s conflicts of interest, integrity, processes, and scientific rigour face appraisal, rightfully raising questions about its effectiveness and credibility.
The International Health Regulations and the Pandemic Treaty or Accord
The WHO wields significant influence through instruments like the International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005. However, recent amendments to the IHR and proposals for a new pandemic treaty or accord spark dissent and amplify legitimate concerns about the WHO’s funders and their approach to global health. The WHO facilitated amendments to these two instruments have resulted in member states, the public, organizations, health workers, lawyers, and politicians speaking up against health monopoly, debt, and human rights violations.
Critics of the controversial IHR amendments contend that they have unrealistic expectations, burden member states with debt, and transform the WHO’s role from advisory to governance. Skeptics of the new pandemic treaty raise concerns about its potential to undermine national sovereignty, infringe on civil liberties, and exacerbate existing inequities in access to healthcare. Both fail to address fundamental flaws in global health governance, including the unequal distribution of resources, power imbalances between developed and developing countries, and the influence of conflicts of interests, such as pharmaceutical companies and donor governments.
The WHO’s International Health Regulations amendments and proposed pandemic treaty or accord demand rigorous scrutiny and critical engagement from civil society, governments, public health workers, and lawyers. The lack of meaningful national engagement with civil society and marginalized communities undermines the legitimacy and effectiveness of the negotiation process, reinforcing perceptions of top-down decision-making and exclusionary practices within the WHO. It is primarily for this reason, in addition to the WHO’s failures and conflicts of interest, that the the World Council for Health is obliged to present an Expert Hearing to:
a) Independently appraise the WHO’s conduct and processes
b) Discuss strategies to counter the WHO’s expansion of power
This Expert Hearing is taking place at 6 pm UTC on Tuesday 26 March 2024, and will be hosted by Shabnam Palesa Mohamed and Dr Tess Lawrie. Expert speakers include Dr Meryl Nass (USA), James Roguski (USA), Fahrie Hassan (RSA), Katie Ashby Koppens (NZ), Phillip Kruse (Switzerland), Robin Tilbrook (UK), and Fred Corbin (St Lucia). Public participation during the expert hearing will be encouraged. Meanwhile, you can share your strategies via email: [email protected]
A call to action for health, freedom and sovereignty
In light of these critiques, amongst many, and the extraction of resources from our countries, health freedom activists, civil society organizations, and governments must explore effective strategies to counter the WHO and to ensure integrative, transparent, and collaborative health.
Join the Expert Hearing on Monday 26 March at 6 pm UTC on the World Council for Health website: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/whowithdrawal
If you are a member state delegate or a politician who would like to learn more and or hear civil society’s views on the WHO facilitated power grab, please email [email protected].
Valuable Resources
WCH Policy Brief: Rejecting Monopoly Power Over Global Public Health (April 2023)
South Africa WHO Withdrawal Bill
WCH Legal Brief: Preventing the Abuse of Public Health Emergencies (February 2024)
© 2024 Dr Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD
Please visit the World Council for Health
RELATED ITEM
TESS LAWRIE EXPOSES THE W.H.O. (VIDEO)
Former W.H.O. Consultant, Tess Lawrie, MD, PhD, discusses why global health regulatory agencies’ motives are no longer about solving health crises and the powerful influence they have on governments worldwide.
Please visit Steve Cook for more articles, fiction, humor/satire and verse
The above was featured on WebWide News and UK Reloaded
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply