Whether you think of it as an analogy or as an accurate portrayal of the human condition, Stefan Molyneux’s controversial essay about the rise and (hopefully) fall of the tax farmer will make you think. Early humans could only produce what they consumed. There was no excess for a slave master to steal, so there was no point owning slaves. However, when agricultural improvements allowed for excess crop production, human ownership became an advantage. History tells us that early governments were in fact a ruling class of slave hunters who believed that because humans could produce more than they consumed, they were worth capturing, breaking in and owning. Early Egyptian and Chinese empires were in reality human farms where captured humans were domesticated and owned like any other livestock. – KK
Human Farming: The Story of Your Enslavement This is the story of your enslavement; how it came to be and how you can finally be free.
Like all animals, human beings want to dominate and exploit the resources around them. At first, we mostly hunted and fished and ate off the land – but then something magical and terrible happened to our minds.
We became, alone among the animals, afraid of death, and of future loss. And this was the start of a great tragedy, and an even greater possibility…
You see, when we became afraid of death, of injury and imprisonment, we became controllable — and so valuable — in a way that no other resource could ever be.
The greatest resource for any human being to control is not natural resources, or tools, or animals or land — but other human beings.
You can frighten an animal, because animals are afraid of pain in the moment, but you cannot frighten an animal with a loss of liberty, or with torture or imprisonment in the future, because animals have very little sense of tomorrow.
You cannot threaten a cow with torture, or a sheep with death. You cannot swing a sword at a tree and scream at it to produce more fruit, or hold a burning torch to a field and demand more wheat. You cannot get more eggs by threatening a hen – but you can get a man to give you his eggs by threatening him.
Human farming has been the most profitable — and destructive — occupation throughout history and it is now reaching its destructive climax.
Human society can not be rationally understood until it is seen for what it is: a series of farms where human farmers own human livestock.
Some people get confused because governments provide healthcare and water and education and roads, and thus imagine that there is some benevolence at work. Nothing could be further from reality.
Farmers provide healthcare and irrigation and training to their livestock.
Some people get confused because we are allowed certain liberties, and thus imagine that our government protects our freedoms.
But farmers plant their crops a certain distance apart to increase their yields — and will allow certain animals larger stalls or fields if it means they will produce more meat and milk.
In your country, your tax farm, your tax farmer grants you certain freedoms not because he cares about your liberties, but because he wants to increase his profits.
Are you beginning to see the nature of the cage you were born into?
There have been four major phases of human farming:
PHASE ONE: Direct and Brutal Slavery in Ancient Egypt
The first phase, slavery in ancient Egypt, was direct and brutal human compulsion. Human bodies were controlled, but the creative productivity of the human mind remained outside the reach of the whip and the brand and the shackles. Slaves remained woefully under productive, and required enormous resources to control.
PHASE TWO: Roman Slaves Are Free to Show A Modicum of Ingenuity
The second phase was the Roman model, wherein slaves were granted some capacity for freedom, ingenuity and creativity, which raised their productivity. This increased the wealth of Rome, and thus the tax income of the Roman government – and with this additional wealth, Rome became an empire, destroying the economic freedoms that fed its power, and collapsed.
I’m sure that this does not seem entirely unfamiliar.
PHASE THREE: Feudal Serfdom
After the collapse of Rome, the feudal serfdom model (and here, too) introduced the concept of livestock ownership and taxation. Instead of being directly owned, peasants and serfs farmed land that they could retain as long as they paid off the local warlords. This model broke down due to the continual subdivision of productive farm land, and was destroyed during the Enclosure movement, when land was consolidated and hundreds of thousands of serfs were kicked off their ancestral lands, because new farming techniques made larger farms more productive with fewer people.
The increased productivity of the late Middle Ages created the excess food required for the expansion of towns and cities, which in turn gave rise to the modern Democratic model of human ownership.
As displaced serfs and peasants flooded into the cities, a huge stock of cheap human capital became available to the rising industrialists – and the ruling class of human farmers quickly realized that they could make more money by letting their human livestock choose their own occupations.
PHASE FOUR: The Democratic Model
Under the Democratic model, direct slave ownership has been replaced by the Mafia model. The Mafia rarely owns businesses directly, but rather sends thugs around once a month to steal from the business “owners.”
You are now allowed to choose your own occupation, which raises your productivity – and thus the taxes you can pay to your masters.
Your few freedoms are preserved because they are profitable to your owners.
The great challenge of the Democratic model is that increases in wealth and freedom threaten the tax farmer. The ruling classes initially profit from a relatively free market in capital and labor, but as their human livestock become more used to their freedoms and growing wealth, they begin to question why they need rulers at all.
Ah well. Nobody ever said that human farming was easy.
HUMAN LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT Keeping human livestock securely in the compounds of the ruling classes is a three phase process.
Phase One: Indoctrination The first phase is to indoctrinate the young through government “education.” As the wealth of democratic countries grew, government schools were universally inflicted in order to control the thoughts and souls of the livestock.
Phase Two: Division The second phase is to turn citizens against each other through the creation of dependent livestock. It is very difficult to rule human beings directly through force — and where it can be achieved, it remains cripplingly under productive, as can be seen in North Korea. Human beings do not breed well or produce efficiently in direct captivity. If human beings believe that they are free, then they will produce much more for their farmers.
The best way to maintain this illusion of freedom is to put some of the livestock on the payroll of the farmer.
Those cows that become dependent on the existing hierarchy will then attack any other cows who point out the violence, hypocrisy and immorality of human ownership. Freedom is slavery, and slavery is freedom. If you can get the cows to attack each other whenever anybody brings up the reality of their situation, then you don’t have to spend nearly as much controlling them directly. Those cows who become dependent upon the stolen largess of the farmer will violently oppose any questioning of the virtue of human ownership — and the intellectual and artistic classes, always and forever dependent upon the farmers — will say, to anyone who demands freedom from human ownership: “You will harm your fellow cows.”
The human livestock are kept enclosed by shifting the moral responsibility for the destructiveness of a violent system of slavery to those who demand real freedom.
Phase Three: Fear The Third Phase is to invent continual external threats, so that the frightened human cattle cling to the “protection” of the human farmers.
This system of human farming is now nearing its end.
The terrible tragedy of the modern American system has occurred not in spite of, but because of past economic freedoms.
The massive increases in American wealth throughout the 19th century resulted from economic freedom — and it was this very increase in wealth that fed the size and power of the state.
Whenever the livestock become exponentially more productive, you get a corresponding increase in the number of farmers and their dependents.
The growth of the state is always proportional to the preceding economic freedoms.
Economic freedom creates wealth, and the wealth attracts more thieves and political parasites, whose greed then destroys the economic freedom.
In other words, freedom metastasizes the cancer of the state.
The government that starts off the smallest will always end up the largest.
This is why there can be no viable and sustainable alternative to a truly free and peaceful society.
A society without political rulers, without human ownership, without the violence of taxation and statism…
To be truly free is both very easy, and very hard.
We avoid the horror of our enslavement because it is painful to see it directly.
We dance around the violence of our dying system because we fear the attacks of our fellow livestock.
But we can only be kept in the cages we refuse to see. Wake up…
To see the farm is to leave it.
See featured article at From sovereign to Serf
You were mostly spot on, but it’s alot deeper than you realize. It’s not for taxes. Money is a tool of illusion. The ones who run the world literally have unlimited cards and accounts. They don’t need our taxes. The economy is an illusion. Each economy is an experiment. And the way we break free isn’t simply to realize that we’re enslaved. First of all, everyone would have to wake up nearly simultaneously. And they already have plans for if that were to happen. We still need the essentials of life which is food, water and shelter. They control all of that. If they shut down water, electricity, or gas, we’re screwed. And that’s exact what will happen if we wake up and try to leave the farm or fight back. We have to become self sustaining again. COMMUNE-ITY/COMMUNE-ITY is what we need. To work together as a community producing, providing and sharing our own resources.
I agree with most of the comments aimed at and against you and your “tricky” way of Not Only justifying Slavery but glorifying it and making it sound more erotic, more humane. Really!?? I just bet You would be the farmer. huh. Not the cattle, the bull, you or your family, I don’t believe you would agree or allow (you and yours) to live out your lives in cages or stalls. I think You either are Communist, illusional, or demented.. or just a plain liar trying to get recognition, a rise out of the readers on this website. All I have to say is, you’re full of it. Write something worthwhile. Something you would ‘back’ with your and your loved ones lives. In other words, if you believe all you wrote.. Go For It. You First!
Thank you for sharing my post! You guys rock!
Yes, humankind may well be enslaved, but the reasoning of this article in putting all blame on democratic government is faulty.
Who do we work for? Where does the money go? Taxes do not go into the pockets of politician, they are used for spending on public works and services for the people and society.
It is private individuals who get rich on this ‘slavery’ the 1% who own the multinational companies that enslaves people with work and poor pay.
Government should be for the people to protect them and society against these rich private interests. Do you think they would just disappear without a government?
The problem is these rich private interests control the government through lobbying and the populations voting for the government through media propaganda.
The answer is to improve the processes of government to make it fair, transparent and truly accountable to the people. The problem is not that we have a government, it is not truly democratic. A government should devolve it powers to be run by the people for the interests of the people.
To maintain that government rather than corporations are enslaving us is very woolly thinking indeed.
Wow! So well done, so nicely put, cogent, persuasive, paced “just right”. (I saw the excellent video.) Human farming. Like the southern US proverb goes, “Dey tryin’ put you BACK on de plantation!” (Er, we never left. Dang!)
To cattle-ize humans; to dehumanize them and enslave humans (by other, “humane” humans). People farming people – as ants farm aphids.
SLAVERY IS WICKED AND EVIL.AM SO SORRY FOR WAT MY ANCESTORS GO THROUGH,AM SO HURT ABOUT IT.FOR THE SPAINSH AND THE AMERICAN TO DO.THEY SHOULD TREAT US LIKE CLIVE PEOPLE NT LIKE ANIMALS
Your historical analysis is concise and precise. However, are you aware of how some of your phrases are programming the interpretations of the reader?
Slogans like “to see the farm is to leave it” have no relevance to an actual human life. Have you ever been in the “cage” of a jail cell? If you recgonize the jail cell as a cage, how does that change the nature of the cage at all?
If we shared this article with 10 police chiefs around the world and then told them that their jobs involve violence, what would they do? Would they quit because you “woke them up?” If they quit, would they be replaced, or would the police department immediately collpase never to be replaced?
“We [!] dance around the violence of our dying system [?] because we fear the attacks of our fellow livestock.” No, you are ashamed of admitting the violence openly because of your current lack of resources and courage. You may hope that the system will “die,” but what if it is just shifting? Did the “fall” of the Roman Empire end all human farming or just precede the feudal phase (an increase in efficiency)?
Police chiefs do not pretend that they are not officers of systems of organized coercion. To see the farm is only to see the farm. To leave it is… a very easy set of words to say.
I came here to your site because you placed a comment on one of my articles. I presume that you did not actually read it (or at least did not understand it).
I respect your intelligence, which I am sure you will recognize is rare amongst your class. Perhaps you are open to a conversation.